IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aaeatr/377653.html

Impossible Inferences: A Note on Inconsistency in Business Statistics

Author

Listed:
  • Eisenhauer, Joseph G.

Abstract

Textbooks designed for business statistics customarily present inferential statistics whose premises contradict the definitions developed in descriptive statistics. In particular, because the standard deviation of a population cannot be calculated if the population mean is unknown, hypothesis tests and confidence intervals for the mean that rely on the population standard deviation pose an inconsistency between lessons. To reduce potential confusion and utilize both class time and students’ homework time efficiently, the present note proposes de-emphasizing these tests and intervals in favor of those that depend on the sample standard deviation.

Suggested Citation

  • Eisenhauer, Joseph G., 2025. "Impossible Inferences: A Note on Inconsistency in Business Statistics," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 7(4), August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:377653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/377653/files/AETR_2025_0220%20Final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simons, Andrew M., . "Making Business Statistics Come Alive: Incorporating Field Trial Data from a Cookstove Study into the Classroom," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 2(3).
    2. Ismael G. Dambolena & Steven E. Eriksen & David P. Kopcso, 2009. "An Intuitive Introduction to Hypothesis Testing," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 53-62, January.
    3. Scott P. Stevens & Susan W. Palocsay, 2012. "Identifying Addressable Impediments to Student Learning in an Introductory Statistics Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 124-139, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susan W. Palocsay & Scott P. Stevens & Luis J. Novoa, 2020. "STRATA: A Spreadsheet Tool for Multidimensional Analysis of Operations Research/Management Science Assessment Test Data," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 41-56, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:377653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.