IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aaeatr/377650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflecting on Using Reflection Exercises to Improve Student Learning and Teaching Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Kropp, Jaclyn D.

Abstract

In this commentary, I reflect on employing reflection exercises to improve student learning and teaching effectiveness. The theory of reflective learning and the importance of engaging in reflection after active and experiential learning are discussed. I present on overview of the reflection exercises that I employ, which are based on the Respond, Summarize, Vocabulary, Pose a New Question (RSVP) method and Gibbs’ reflective cycle. Reflection assignments allow students to document their learning experience while also providing feedback used to make improvements to the course in real time. The summaries and questions posed by students assist with the identification of topics and concepts that need to be reviewed and remediated. Employing these exercises have increased students’ class attendance, engagement, immediacy, and average course grades as well as my rapport with students and scores on my formal end-of-term course evaluations. Students’ suggestions have led to the deletion of old assignments, creation of new assignments and reorganization of the course material, improving course effectiveness. Students indicate benefiting from engaging in the reflection exercises by feeling more connected to the course material. Students also demonstrate a deeper understanding of the course material.

Suggested Citation

  • Kropp, Jaclyn D., 2024. "Reflecting on Using Reflection Exercises to Improve Student Learning and Teaching Effectiveness," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 7(3), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:377650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/377650/files/AETR_2024_0142%20Final%20PDF.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:377650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.