IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aaeatr/377646.html

Using NetLogo to Build an Agent-Based Model for Teaching Purposes at the Graduate Student Level

Author

Listed:
  • Collins, Bryan
  • Liang, Chyi-Lyi (Kathleen)

Abstract

Scholars and educators in agricultural economics face changing paradigms moving toward system-wide studies. Complex issues often involve quantitative and qualitative approaches, and it is difficult to access or acquire user-friendly tools that integrate both approaches. Agent-based modeling (ABM) offers a unique supplement to more conventional system-wide modeling frameworks, such as supply chain models, circular economy models, or coupled human and natural system models. The purpose of this paper is to show educators and graduate students about how agent-based models can be used in a graduate program curriculum. The paper shares some insight about the concept and sample applications of ABM, a popular analytic tool to study system-behavior-decision consequences through the interactions of entities. We use an example of simulating a buyer-grower market interaction for poultry products to demonstrate step-by-step strategies of using the NetLogo program to create an agent-based model. The benefits of using agent-based models include flexibilities of generating micro-level assumptions to approximate macro-level activities and outcomes, and the comprehensive integration between quantitative and qualitative analyses. The challenges are at the beginning phase to comprehend the scope and scale of analysis, define proper agents and behavioral characteristics, and generate meaningful interactions among agents in a logical manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Collins, Bryan & Liang, Chyi-Lyi (Kathleen), 2024. "Using NetLogo to Build an Agent-Based Model for Teaching Purposes at the Graduate Student Level," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 7(3), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:377646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/377646/files/AETR_2023_044RR%20Final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hare, M & Deadman, P, 2004. "Further towards a taxonomy of agent-based simulation models in environmental management," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 25-40.
    2. Louise O Fresco & Floor Geerling-Eiff & Anne-Charlotte Hoes & Lan van Wassenaer & Krijn J Poppe & Jack G A J van der Vorst, 2021. "Sustainable food systems: do agricultural economists have a role? [Interdisciplinary collaboration between natural and social sciences–status and trends exemplified in groundwater research]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(4), pages 694-718.
    3. Camelia Delcea & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Ramona Paun, 2018. "Agent-Based Evaluation of the Airplane Boarding Strategies’ Efficiency and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Balmann, Alfons, 1997. "Farm-Based Modelling of Regional Structural Change: A Cellular Automata Approach," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 24(1), pages 85-108.
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0221564 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Leigh Tesfatsion & Kenneth L. Judd (ed.), 2006. "Handbook of Computational Economics," Handbook of Computational Economics, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 2, number 2.
    7. Silva, Petrônio C.L. & Batista, Paulo V.C. & Lima, Hélder S. & Alves, Marcos A. & Guimarães, Frederico G. & Silva, Rodrigo C.P., 2020. "COVID-ABS: An agent-based model of COVID-19 epidemic to simulate health and economic effects of social distancing interventions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    8. Laato, Samuli & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Farooq, Ali & Dhir, Amandeep, 2020. "Unusual purchasing behavior during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: The stimulus-organism-response approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    9. Kremmydas, Dimitris & Athanasiadis, Ioannis N. & Rozakis, Stelios, 2018. "A review of Agent Based Modeling for agricultural policy evaluation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 95-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diego Ferraro & Daniela Blanco & Sebasti'an Pessah & Rodrigo Castro, 2021. "Land use change in agricultural systems: an integrated ecological-social simulation model of farmer decisions and cropping system performance based on a cellular automata approach," Papers 2109.01031, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    2. Stefano Balbi & Carlo Giupponi, 2009. "Reviewing agent-based modelling of socio-ecosystems: a methodology for the analysis of climate change adaptation and sustainability," Working Papers 2009_15, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    3. Ferraro, Diego O. & Ghersa, Felipe & Castro, Rodrigo, 2024. "Predicting land use and environmental dynamics in Argentina's Pampas region: An agent-based modeling approach across varied price and climatic scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 498(C).
    4. Carauta, Marcelo & Troost, Christian & Guzman-Bustamante, Ivan & Hampf, Anna & Libera, Affonso & Meurer, Katharina & Bönecke, Eric & Franko, Uwe & Ribeiro Rodrigues, Renato de Aragão & Berger, Thomas, 2021. "Climate-related land use policies in Brazil: How much has been achieved with economic incentives in agriculture?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Marten Graubner & Richard J. Sexton, 2023. "More competitive than you think? Pricing and location of processing firms in agricultural markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(3), pages 784-808, May.
    6. Robert Huber & Hang Xiong & Kevin Keller & Robert Finger, 2022. "Bridging behavioural factors and standard bio‐economic modelling in an agent‐based modelling framework," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 35-63, February.
    7. Tong Zhang & B. Wade Brorsen, 2010. "The Long-Run and Short-Run Impact of Captive Supplies on the Spot Market Price: An Agent-Based Artificial Market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(4), pages 1181-1194.
    8. Tatiana Filatova & Anne Van Der Veen & Dawn C. Parker, 2009. "Land Market Interactions between Heterogeneous Agents in a Heterogeneous Landscape—Tracing the Macro‐Scale Effects of Individual Trade‐Offs between Environmental Amenities and Disamenities," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 57(4), pages 431-457, December.
    9. Chiba, Asako, 2020. "Modeling the effects of contact-tracing apps on the spread of the coronavirus disease: mechanisms, conditions, and efficiency," MPRA Paper 103299, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Huber, Robert & Bakker, Martha & Balmann, Alfons & Berger, Thomas & Bithell, Mike & Brown, Calum & Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne & Xiong, Hang & Le, Quang Bao & Mack, Gabriele & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Millingt, 2018. "Representation of decision-making in European agricultural agent-based models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 143-160.
    11. Graubner, Marten & Sexton, Richard J., 2023. "More competitive than you think? Pricing and location of processing firms in agricultural markets," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 105(3), pages 784-808.
    12. Coronese, Matteo & Occelli, Martina & Lamperti, Francesco & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "AgriLOVE: Agriculture, land-use and technical change in an evolutionary, agent-based model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    13. Tyler Freeman & James Nolan & Richard Schoney, 2009. "An Agent‐Based Simulation Model of Structural Change in Canadian Prairie Agriculture, 1960–2000," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 57(4), pages 537-554, December.
    14. Wood, Aaron D. & Berry, Kevin, 2024. "COVID-19 transmission in a resource dependent community with heterogeneous populations: An agent-based modeling approach," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    15. Kaye-Blake, William & Schilling, Chris & Monaghan, Ross & Vibart, Ronaldo & Dennis, Samuel & Post, Elizabeth, 2019. "Quantification of environmental-economic trade-offs in nutrient management policies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 458-468.
    16. De Vroey Michel & Duarte Pedro Garcia, 2013. "In search of lost time: the neoclassical synthesis," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 965-995, January.
    17. Shahira Ariffin & Norsiah Ahmad & Nadhrathul Ain Ibrahim & Intan Syafinaz Mat Shafie & Nur Shahrulliza Muhammad & Norhusniyati Husin, 2024. "The Impact of Visual Stimuli on Online Shopper’s Emotion: Applying S-O-R Theory in Online Fashion Retail," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(3), pages 591-601.
    18. Kyrtsou, Catherine & Labys, Walter C., 2007. "Detecting positive feedback in multivariate time series: The case of metal prices and US inflation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 377(1), pages 227-229.
    19. Popoyan, Lilit & Napoletano, Mauro & Roventini, Andrea, 2017. "Taming macroeconomic instability: Monetary and macro-prudential policy interactions in an agent-based model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 117-140.
    20. Eugenio Caverzasi & Alberto Russo, 2018. "Toward a new microfounded macroeconomics in the wake of the crisis," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(6), pages 999-1014.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:377646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.