IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/v7(560)y2011i7(560)p31-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Meanings of “Made in Romania” among the Romanian Consumers

Author

Listed:
  • Cătălin Mihail BARBU

    (University of Craiova)

Abstract

In this paper I studied the meanings of made in Romania concept among the Romanian consumers. The methodology required that respondents were interviewed about their attitudes. The results show that made in Romania has a negative connotation, and that made in Germany and made in USA are better appreciated. Still, made in Romania has obtained a better score than made in China. There are perspectives for the improvement of the meanings of made in Romania, the intentions of respondents being a guarantee. The people working in Romania obtained a better score than the results of their work, a warranty for future improvements of made in Romania appreciation.

Suggested Citation

  • Cătălin Mihail BARBU, 2011. "The Meanings of “Made in Romania” among the Romanian Consumers," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(7(560)), pages 31-42, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:7(560):y:2011:i:7(560):p:31-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/610.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=610&rid=76
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radu Florin OGARCA & Sorinel DOMNISORU & Liviu CRACIUN & Laurentiu MIHAI, 2019. "Returnee Entrepreneurship In Romania – Determinants And Perspectives," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(2), pages 7-23, November.
    2. Cătălin Mihail Barbu & Anca Floriana Păunescu & Oprea Valentin Busu, 2019. "Promoting Social Innovation Using Marketing And Communication Tools," Annals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 2(47), pages 42-52, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:7(560):y:2011:i:7(560):p:31-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marin Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.