IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/v10(551)y2010i10(551)p49-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European Economics, Update. Another Ten Theses on the Economic Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Liviu C. ANDREI

    (National School of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest)

Abstract

These theses, in their enunciation and debate sound like: I. There are both “incipient” and “advanced” integration processes; II. Integration changes its outline; III. There is also the „second European economics”; IV. The Communitarz Agricultural Programme (CAP), as a “mettre à l’abîme” of the whole integration process; V. The national economies convergency reads the condition of the Union itself; VI. The EU budget might be a political stake; VII. The European Monetary System (EMS) is a... paradox; VIII. The public economy might be a “thorn in the unique market’s eye”; IX, Is the economic integration predestined to an unachieved strategy example?! X. Beyond all skepticism, it would be better out of the (need of) integration. All of these above try to describe the picture of a half century process, in Europe. Plus, this tries to explain why Europe is different from the rest of the world, not necessarily more or less developed or well to do, as for a usual pattern.

Suggested Citation

  • Liviu C. ANDREI, 2010. "European Economics, Update. Another Ten Theses on the Economic Integration," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 10(10(551)), pages 49-72, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:10(551):y:2010:i:10(551):p:49-72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/520.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=520&rid=67
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:ath:journl:tome:34:v:2:y:2014:i:34:p:13-21 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:10(551):y:2010:i:10(551):p:49-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marin Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.