IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aft/journl/v112mayaug2013p75-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spain And Brazil In The Construction Of The Democratic Participation: Cleavages And Consensuses

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo Alberto Toledo

    (Universidade Estadual Paulista)

  • Rodrigo Augusto Prando

    (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie)

Abstract

The article searches to launch some analyses and investigations on the historical reach of produced participative processes in Spain and Brazil. Evidently, both the processes if had uncurled in historical, social, economic contexts and distinct politicians, but, exactly thus, keep some approaches that we intend to give prominence in the present article. How much to the dismantlement of the State of social welfare, we present, still, that in the case of Spain occurred a decentralization of its formulator power to decide arrangement of public politics that started to count on the participation of social actors in the called relational city (BECERRA, 2011). In the case of Brazil, the dictatorial period (1964-1985), the fast urban growth and the generation of precarious peripheries in the main cities, the distension and the Constituent (1986-1988) had generated the enough forces of pressure so that, gradually, if it incorporated the participative arrangement in the power to decide process.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo Alberto Toledo & Rodrigo Augusto Prando, 2013. "Spain And Brazil In The Construction Of The Democratic Participation: Cleavages And Consensuses," Revista de Economia Mackenzie (REM), Mackenzie Presbyterian University, Social and Applied Sciences Center, vol. 11(1), pages 75-110, January-A.
    • Handle: RePEc:aft:journl:v:11:2:may:aug:2013:p:75-110
    DOI: -
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/rem/article/view/5859
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/-?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aft:journl:v:11:2:may:aug:2013:p:75-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Instituto Presbiteriano Mackenzie (IPM) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcmacbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.