Author
Abstract
At the moment, the public sector all over Europe undergoes an efficiency and effectiveness cure. The financial economic crisis sheds another light on several changes. It surely rises, more than ever, another dimension in the debate: “reaching more with less resources”. With this paper, we wish to analyze the situation in the Flemish government more closely. Changes in the socio-economic environment of the public sector challenge their internal management. Increasingly, organizations perform their managerial tasks in a result- oriented way, often by introducing private sector managerial techniques. More and more, innovative management techniques and mechanisms are explored, whether on a small project based scale or on a larger scale. So there is the rise of “new” policy instruments and the way administrations organize themselves. In this paper, we examine the way the Flemish Department of Public Governance and the Chancellery is dealing with its new role as centre of government. Such a Centers of Governments are gaining importance in a complex political scenery confronted with wicked issues within a changing societal context. Besides its positioning within the societal context, there is also a major internal shift within the department. Inspired by innovative management techniques, a transition is going on from a rather classical hierarchical structure to a network governance structure constituted by a set of self-organizing teams. In the paper, we present the changing positioning of the department and the way the internal transition is initiated and implemented further. Besides, in the empirical part of the paper, we also use the data of a survey within the organization dealing with the support of the transition and the new working principles.
Suggested Citation
Dries Verlet, 2016.
"Emerging Trends within the Public Sector in Flanders. Towards a Self-Organising Centre of Government,"
Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 272-281, September.
Handle:
RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:272-281
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:272-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.