IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/infoec/v28y2024i4p45-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of The Digitization of the European Union and Serbia Based on the MEREC and MARCOS Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Radojko LUKIC

Abstract

In recent times, digitization is increasingly becoming a critical factor in business success. Given this, knowing the level of digitization is a key assumption for improvement in the future. Bearing that in mind, this study comparatively analyzes the level of digitization of the member states of the European Union (EU) and Serbia using the MEREC and MARCOS methods. The results indicate which member states of the European Union need to speed up the digitization process to achieve the optimal level of success in realizing the target business. A higher level of digitization means better business success. In the European Union, the highest level of digitization is in the Netherlands. Next: Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Spain and so on. The leading countries of the European Union are positioned: Germany is in eighteenth place, France is in fourteenth place and Italy is in twentieth place. In the European Union, in terms of digitization, Romania took the worst position. Serbia (twenty-eighth place) is therefore in a very bad position among the member states of the European Union and in the surrounding area (Croatia is in thirteenth place, and Slovenia is in sixteenth place). In Serbia, to achieve the desired business success, it is necessary to significantly increase the level of digitization.

Suggested Citation

  • Radojko LUKIC, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of The Digitization of the European Union and Serbia Based on the MEREC and MARCOS Methods," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 28(4), pages 45-62.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:28:y:2024:i:4:p:45-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.revistaie.ase.ro/content/112/04%20-%20lukic.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:28:y:2024:i:4:p:45-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Pocatilu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.