IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/icafee/v4y2015p368-376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study of the rural development in some states of the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Bogdan-Cristian Chiripuci

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

This article addresses a comparative analysis of rural development programs (2007-2013 and 2014-2020) in some European Union countries, mostly Romania, Poland and Czech Republic. All three analyzed European countries, chose four priority axes for the period 2007-2013 under the Rural Development Programme, while for 2014-2020, Romania has achieved 16 development measures, Poland has made seven development measures and the Czech Republic 6 development measures. The amounts allocated are different both in total and for each axis separately. The difference is given by the needs of rural area, agriculture development strategies and not least, the bargaining power of each entity with the European Commission. To better view the state of negotiations of each individual Member State and the supreme institution, we can make a ratio between the allocated monetary value and the area of that country. The absorption rate for 2007-2013 was 100% for Poland and the Czech Republic and according to the statements of the minister of agriculture, Daniel Constantin, Romania will reach this figure by the end of 2015. For the new rural development program it’s wanted the adjustement of the negative aspects of the previous period and the spending of the allocated amounts within the earliest possible date.

Suggested Citation

  • Bogdan-Cristian Chiripuci, 2015. "Comparative study of the rural development in some states of the European Union," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 4, pages 368-376.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:icafee:v:4:y:2015:p:368-376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cafee.ase.ro/wp-content/upload/2015edition/file2015(41).pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:icafee:v:4:y:2015:p:368-376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elena Preda (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.