Systemic Crisis Management and Central Bank Independence. An Empirical Analysis
The current financial crisis, through its global dimension, resulted in an intensification of efforts of specialists to find the best policies for crisis management, on the one hand, and to improve the regulatory and supervision framework, on the other hand, both essential conditions for restoring the confidence in the financial system. The goal of the present study is to build a bridge among these recent studies and other approaches, older or newer, on the role of central bank in ensuring financial stability. More concrete, the goal of our scientific approach is to determine, based on empirical analysis, if there is a relationship of dependency between the costs of systemic crises and central bank independence, an issue, otherwise, little explored in literature. In other words, we will try to answer the question: Do central banks with higher degree of independence manage systemic crises more effectively than with lower level of independence? At first glance, the answer would be that central banks with higher degree of independence are able to manage more efficiently systemic crises. The results of the empirical analysis based on a sample of 40 systemic crises, however, led us to another conclusion, namely those central banks with higher degree of independence showed a poor performance in reducing the costs and duration of the crisis, but managed to maintain lower inflation rates during these periods.
Volume (Year): 12 (2010)
Issue (Month): 28 (June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://amfiteatrueconomic.ase.ro/
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Luis Ignacio JÃ¡come, 2008. "Central Bank Involvement in Banking Crises in Latin America," IMF Working Papers 08/135, International Monetary Fund.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:12:y:2010:i:28:p:594-605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Valentin Dumitru)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.