IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aem/wpaper/y2020i16p119-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intercultural “Diagnosis” of Management in the Republic of Moldova According to Geert Hofstede Model: Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Angela PIRLOG

Abstract

High rates of scientific and technological progress, computerization, globalization and internationalization of the world economy leads to the approach and interpenetration of business from different national cultures. The present paper is the “radiography” of the national culture in the Republic of Moldova according to Geert Hofstede theoretical model. Also, it identifies the variation and peculiarities of national culture dimensions: power distance index (PDI), individualism versus collectivism (IDV), uncertainty avoidance index (UAI), masculinity versus femininity (MAS), long term orientation versus short term normative orientation (LTO), indulgence versus restraint (IVR) in the countries of our study, Republic of Moldova and its main business partners: Romania, Russia, Ukraine, China and Germany.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela PIRLOG, 2020. "Intercultural “Diagnosis” of Management in the Republic of Moldova According to Geert Hofstede Model: Comparative Analysis," CSIE Working Papers, Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), issue 16, pages 119-128, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:aem:wpaper:y:2020:i:16:p:119-128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://csei.ase.md/wp/files/issue16/WP_Issue16_119-128_PIR.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Angela PIRLOG, 2021. "Cross-cultural Analysis of Main Economic Partners of the Republic of Moldova," Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies (EEJRS), Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), vol. 7(2), pages 165-181, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aem:wpaper:y:2020:i:16:p:119-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Rodica CRUDU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/acecsmd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.