IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aem/wpaper/y2019i14p15-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Internal Governance as an Element of the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP)

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasia BEJAN

Abstract

In recent years, the internal governance issues in the banking sector have received increased attention on the international level. One of the global financial crisis causes was banks’ weak and superficial internal governance practices. Before the financial crisis, banks have not effectively implemented the internal control mechanisms and risk management, because the goal of profit maximization prevailed and conditioned the banks managers to take the decisions with a high degree of risk. The European Banking Authority (EBA) is constantly concerned with issuing the best policies for an efficient banking supervision in the European countries. In this context, EBA included the internal governance assessment as a component of the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). The difference between the previous researches on the internal governance topic and the present article is the fact that it analyzes the peculiarities of the internal governance assessment during the SREP process, performed by the supervisory authority. The supervisory authority task is to assess whether or not a bank’s internal governance arrangements are adequate for and correspond to the institution’s risk profile, business model, size and complexity. The score assigned following the internal governance assessment expresses the supervisory authority view on the adequacy of the institution’s internal governance arrangements and institution wide controls.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasia BEJAN, 2019. "Assessment of the Internal Governance as an Element of the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP)," CSIE Working Papers, Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), issue 14, pages 15-26, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:aem:wpaper:y:2019:i:14:p:15-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://csei.ase.md/wp/files/issue14/WP_Issue14_15-26_BEJ.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aem:wpaper:y:2019:i:14:p:15-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Rodica CRUDU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/acecsmd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.