Author
Abstract
The paper explores the application of the quadruple helix (QH) model in the creation and implementation of strategic documents of Slovak self-governing regions (NUTS III). Using the Programs of Economic Development and Social Development (PEDSD) as the main source, the study compares the involvement of the four helices - public sector, private sector, academia, and civil society - across all eight regions. To achieve this, a qualitative research design based on directed content analysis was employed, allowing the systematic identification of QH actor roles within the documents. The evaluation draws on a four-dimensional analytical scale capturing institutional involvement, level of participation, document emphasis, and impact on strategic content. The analysis reveals that the public sector remains the dominant actor, coordinating the planning process and ensuring alignment with national policies. The private sector is actively engaged in economically advanced regions, where industrial clusters and SMEs contribute to competitiveness and innovation, but less so in structurally disadvantaged areas. The academic sphere plays a fundamental role in shaping innovation and knowledge-oriented priorities, particularly in regions where universities directly coordinated or authored PEDSDs. By contrast, civil society exhibits the highest degree of variation: from active and institutionalized involvement in Bratislava, Nitra, Žilina, Banská Bystrica, Prešov, and Košice SGRs to largely symbolic or declarative engagement in Trnava and Trenčín SGRs. The findings suggest that while the QH framework is formally recognized across all regions, its practical application remains unbalanced. Stronger institutionalization of civic participation and more effective facilitation by regional authorities are needed to reduce asymmetries among helices and to realize the full potential of the model.
Suggested Citation
Monika KVITKOVSKÁ, 2025.
"It Takes Four To Tango: Quadruple Helix And Regional Development In Slovakia,"
Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies (EEJRS), Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), vol. 11(2), pages 84-107, December.
Handle:
RePEc:aem:journl:v:11:y:2025:i:2:p:84-107
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53486/2537-6179.11-2.06
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aem:journl:v:11:y:2025:i:2:p:84-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Rodica CRUDU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/acecsmd.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.