IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Measuring Consumer Behavior Using Experimental Data

Listed author(s):
  • Philippe Février
  • Michael Visser


Registered author(s):

    The hypothesis that the preferences of an individual can be represented by a utility function is at the center of economic theory. However, the main restrictions of the theory (the Slutsky conditions) are often rejected by empirical studies on micro data. This paper uses experimental data to analyze the main explanations of this result. Using the Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preferences (GARP), the subjects of the experiment are divided in two groups: GARP-consistent and GARP-inconsistent individuals. Two models, the translog model and a PIGLOG model, are then estimated for both groups separately and for the total sample. We find that the estimated parameters of the demand equations and tests of the Slutsky restrictions are not influenced by the presence of GARP-inconsistent individuals. Furthermore, the Slutsky restrictions are accepted for the PIGLOG model but rejected for the translog model. The rejection of the Slutsky conditions seems therefore a consequence of a specification problem rather than an "irrationality" problem.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by GENES in its journal Annals Of Economics and Statistics.

    Volume (Year): (2017)
    Issue (Month): 127 ()
    Pages: 9-31

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2017:i:127:p:9-31
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    3, avenue Pierre Larousse, 92245 Malakoff Cedex

    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2017:i:127:p:9-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Laurent Linnemer)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.