IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Not Allow Individuals to Rank Freely? A Scaled Rank-Ordered Logit Approach Applied to Waste Management in Corsica


  • Olivier Beaumais
  • Anne Casabianca
  • Xavier Pieri
  • Dominique Prunetti


Since the introduction of the rank-ordered logit model in the eighties, the cognitive effort involved in a ranking task has been the source of concern. Despite the fact that the rank-ordered logit model provides efficiency gains when compared to the basic multinomial logit model, respondents may not all be able to provide a reliable full ranking of the alternatives they face. Unreliable or 'noisy' rankings result in estimate biases, so that it has even been suggested that only the first three ranks be used for estimation. In order to deal with this ranking capability issue, we propose a survey design which allows the respondents to provide freely incomplete rankings in accordance with their actual heterogeneous ranking capabilities. Using the full-ranking of the alternatives and the accurate sub-ranking of the alternatives, we first estimate a basic rank-ordered logit model. After testing for heteroscedasticity, we also estimate a heteroscedastic rank-ordered logit à la Hausman and Ruud (1987) and introduce a new scaled rank-ordered logit which allows us to model further the sources of heteroscedasticity in the data. The methodology is applied to the issue of waste management in Corsica. Using rankings of waste management options given by a representative sample of the Corsican population (530 respondents) we provide estimates of the willingness-to-pay for various options of waste management calculated from models estimated on the full-ranking and on the sub-ranking data. We find strong evidence that estimations on the full-ranking data set and on the accurate sub-ranking data set differ widely. Allowing individuals to provide freely incomplete rankings eliminates a large part of the heteroscedasticity stemming from heterogeneous ranking capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Beaumais & Anne Casabianca & Xavier Pieri & Dominique Prunetti, 2016. "Why Not Allow Individuals to Rank Freely? A Scaled Rank-Ordered Logit Approach Applied to Waste Management in Corsica," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 121-122, pages 187-212.
  • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2016:i:121-122:p:187-212
    DOI: 10.15609/annaeconstat2009.121-122.187

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item

    Other versions of this item:


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Ankinée Kirakozian, 2016. "One Without The Other? Behavioural And Incentive Policies For Household Waste Management," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 526-551, July.

    More about this item


    Choice Experiment; Heterogeneous Ranking Capabilities; Scaled Rank-Ordered Logit Model; Monetary Valuation; Corsica; Solid Waste Management.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2016:i:121-122:p:187-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.