IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y2015i119-120p95-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of a Compulsory Schooling Reform on Disability Pensioning - Evidence from the Danish Registers

Author

Listed:
  • Nabanita Datta Gupta
  • Steen Bengtsson

Abstract

A growing literature is examining the effects of compulsory schooling reforms on various measures of health later in life (SRH, hospitalization, mortality, BMI, health behaviors and self-reported work disability). However, few studies explore spillover effects of education on disability, and even fewer allow for heterogeneous treatment effects by gender. Yet, disability pensions constitute a large share of health care spending and have implications for health care utilization. Using comprehensive register data from Denmark providing administrative data on both health and disability on the entire Danish population coupled with a major compulsory schooling reform from 1958 that substantially lowered the costs of education and enhanced its quality in rural areas, we estimate Probit, OLS and linear treatment effects models which show that both men and women in rural born cohorts subject to the reform have a lower rate of disability pensioning and fewer medical diagnoses for chronic illnesses later in life compared to urban born counterparts and pre-reform cohorts from both regions. Furthermore, we find that an important channel of transmission of education to disability and health for both men and women is through higher income. A possible explanation for the symmetric effects of education on male and female disability in this setting could be that women in older cohorts in Denmark are more active on the labour market compared to other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Nabanita Datta Gupta & Steen Bengtsson, 2015. "The Effect of a Compulsory Schooling Reform on Disability Pensioning - Evidence from the Danish Registers," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 119-120, pages 95-121.
  • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2015:i:119-120:p:95-121
    DOI: 10.15609/annaeconstat2009.119-120.95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.15609/annaeconstat2009.119-120.95
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15609/annaeconstat2009.119-120.95?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2015:i:119-120:p:95-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.