IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y2012i2012.hs1p183-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'évaluation économique et la décision publique dans le domaine de l'environnement

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique Bureau

Abstract

The state of the art in the assessment of environmental policies shows the boom in eonometric studies seeking to estimate their advantages, using especially contingent valuation or hedonic regression methods. The documented knowledge of willing nesses to pay is now a reality for a number of environmental services. Which makes it possible to develop cost-benefit analyses in this area. Yet the connection with the decision-making process remains uncertain and conflictual. Indeed, the issues of efficiency and equity are heavily interlinked in the case of environmental policies, and economic experts are not the only ones to hold relevant information. This forces us to wonder about the institutional conditions of the production and use of cost· benefit analyses in a context where the risks of capture are high. In this respect, the system of organization which seems to function the best is based on a regulatory obligation 10 assess the efficiency of policies in terms of costs and advantages. The process of assessment must also he supervised to ensure the neutrality of the experts, and to prevent them from participating in the capture of or excessive volatility in public decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique Bureau, 2012. "L'évaluation économique et la décision publique dans le domaine de l'environnement," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 2012.HS1, pages 183-211.
  • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2012:i:2012.hs1:p:183-211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23646358
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2012:i:2012.hs1:p:183-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.