IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y2008i91-92p409-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Effective Subsidy Rates of Student Aid Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Stacey H. Chen

Abstract

Every year millions of high school students and their parents in the US are asked to fill out complicated financial aid application forms. However, few studies have estimated the responsiveness of government financial aid schemes to changes in financial needs of the students. This paper identifies the effective subsidy rate (ESR) of student aid, as defined by the coefficient of financial needs in the regression of financial aid. The ESR measures the proportion of subsidy of student aid under the assumption that all students who enroll in college apply for financial aid. Problems of self-selected applications are considerable because more than one-third of financial aid applicants are ineligible for any form of financial aid; and because about 10 percent of financially needy students do not apply. I cope with endogenous applications by estimating a Tobit-with-Selection model using maximum likelihood estimation methods. The results show that conventional OLS estimates considerably understate the ESR because a large portion of applicants are from high-income families with no financial needs and are ineligible for any form of aid. My finding suggests that it is important to include endogenous applications for financial aid in evaluations of student aid programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Stacey H. Chen, 2008. "Estimating Effective Subsidy Rates of Student Aid Programs," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 91-92, pages 409-425.
  • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2008:i:91-92:p:409-425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27917253
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2008:i:91-92:p:409-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.