IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y2008i91-92p217-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Note on the Common Support Problem in Applied Evaluation Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Lechner

Abstract

This paper advocates the use of a nonparametric bounds analysis to check the robustness of the results of applied evaluation studies to the problem of a lack of common support. The typical responses by researchers of either ignoring it, or obtaining estimates only for the subpopulation within the common support, can both be misleading: Ignoring the problem may result in biases because the comparison group may not be comparable. Deleting observations at best yields an estimator that is consistent for the common support only. When treatment effects differ inside and outside the common support this estimator is inconsistent for the parameter of interest. Furthermore, useful information is ignored, because, for example, the response of the treated to the treatment can be estimated even outside the common support. This information can be used to derive bounds with widths depending on the configuration of the data. The application to an evaluation study of Swiss active labour market policies shows that the relevance of the bounds for changing the interpretation of the results depends very much on the particular data configuration.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Lechner, 2008. "A Note on the Common Support Problem in Applied Evaluation Studies," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 91-92, pages 217-235.
  • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2008:i:91-92:p:217-235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27917246
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2008:i:91-92:p:217-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.