IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y2002i65p55-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of a Collective Model of Labour Supply with Taxation

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Moreau
  • Olivier Donni

Abstract

Chiappori, Fortin and Lacroix [2001] estimate a model of collective labor supply on US data. We adopt the same empirical specification and investigate household labor supply in France. We account for the non-linearity of the budget set. We note that the data validate only partially the restrictions generated by the collective rationality. However, we observe that, when the wife's threat of divorce is more credible, she receives a larger share of the resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Moreau & Olivier Donni, 2002. "Estimation of a Collective Model of Labour Supply with Taxation," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 65, pages 55-83.
    • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2002:i:65:p:55-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20076315
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olivier Donni & Eleonora Matteazzi, 2018. "Collective decisions, household production, and labor force participation," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(7), pages 1064-1080, November.
    2. André de Palma & Nathalie Picard & Ignacio Inoa, 2014. "Discrete choice decision-making with multiple decision-makers within the household," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 16, pages 363-382, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. André de Palma & Nathalie Picard & Robin Lindsey, 2021. "Activity and Transportation Decisions within Households," Working Papers of BETA 2021-37, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2002:i:65:p:55-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.