IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y1994i36p1-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Amélioration de la prévision et causalité entre deux séries d'un systéme multivarié autorégressif stationnaire

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Bruneau
  • Jean-Paul Nicolai

Abstract

In this paper, we study the unidirectional causal links between two series in a multivariate autoregressive stationary framework. We emphasize that the usual characterization of the unidirectional Granger causality, which is based on the prediction improvement oneperiod ahead, is not sufficient to capture all direct and indirect causal links between two series, once there exists a third serie in the system. As a consequence, following Lütkepohl [1990], we consider the prediction improvement for every prediction horizon. But contrary to this author, we do not choose to analyse the unidirectional causal links according to the Sim's approach [1980], which is based on the study of impulse coefficients. Indeed, we prove a theorem, which gives a necessary and sufficient condition to exclude any prediction improvement for every prediction horizon. According to this theorem, both characterizations of unidirectional causality appear to be complementary, because the necessary and sufficient condition is expressed as a constraint on the canonical autoregressive coefficients and the impulse coefficients respectively associated with the causal serie and the caused serie.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Bruneau & Jean-Paul Nicolai, 1994. "Amélioration de la prévision et causalité entre deux séries d'un systéme multivarié autorégressif stationnaire," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 36, pages 1-22.
  • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:1994:i:36:p:1-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20075967
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:1994:i:36:p:1-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.