IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y1991i20-21p243-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wages and Measurement Errors

Author

Listed:
  • Joop Hartog
  • Hans Van Ophem

Abstract

In this paper two wage observations which relate to the same point in time will be compared and the differences analyzed. The OSA-labor market survey contains information about wages received in April 1985 as reported in April 1985 and as reported in October 1986 by the same respondents. Large differences appear to exist. This paper intends to investigate whether these differences are random, by developing and estimating a maximum likelihood model. The estimation results indicate that the differences are not random. In particular, changes in the individual's labor market position seem to be important in the explanation of the observed differences. This conclusion casts strong doubt on the quality of wage variables as reported from the memories of individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Joop Hartog & Hans Van Ophem, 1991. "Wages and Measurement Errors," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 20-21, pages 243-256.
  • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:1991:i:20-21:p:243-256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20075814
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. van den Berg, Gerard J, 1999. "Empirical Inference with Equilibrium Search Models of the Labour Market," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 109(456), pages 283-306, June.
    2. Koning, Pierre & Berg, Gerard J. van den & Ridder, Geert, 1997. "A structural analysis of job search methods and subsequent wages," Serie Research Memoranda 0036, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:1991:i:20-21:p:243-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.