IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adm/journl/v2y2013i12p1-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study in the Execution of Gypsum Coatings under an Environmental Impact Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Fabiane Bordin
  • Suelen Pavi
  • Júlia de Marco
  • Luana Simões Pires de Oliveira
  • Michel Fagundes
  • Maurício Roberto Veronez
  • Francisco Manoel Wohnrath Tognoli
  • Bernardo Fonseca Tutikian

Abstract

The gypsum slurry used in coatings is a construction material that generates many residues. Despite the proven feasibility of recycling, the reduction of waste is still the best way of minimizing the environmental impact. Different technologies have been studied in order to replace its use. However, studies have shown that the losses in construction when using gypsum plasterboard panels are approximately 5%. Although gypsum plasterboard panels seem to be environmentally more suitable, it is necessary to do a comparative study to support the advantages of using plasterboard panels. The survey of aspects and impacts was carried out directly in the monitoring of the implementation procedures in work. For the impact assessment, the methodology took into account significance criteria, scope, frequency and severity. From the score attributed to these criteria was possible to assess the severity of impacts and define which finishes would be environmentally more suitable. As a result has been that the gypsum plasterboard panels causes less environmental impacts during the construction, in this evaluation we found 33 impacts unless that the coatings with gypsum slurry and their most appropriate use under the environmental point of view.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabiane Bordin & Suelen Pavi & Júlia de Marco & Luana Simões Pires de Oliveira & Michel Fagundes & Maurício Roberto Veronez & Francisco Manoel Wohnrath Tognoli & Bernardo Fonseca Tutikian, 2013. "A Comparative Study in the Execution of Gypsum Coatings under an Environmental Impact Perspective," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 2(12), pages 1-7, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:12:p:1-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/article/347
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/pdf/V220131205.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:12:p:1-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Staff ijSciences (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.