IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adm/journl/v11y2022i2p15-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parting with the Past: Logical Conceptualizations and Replications of Vengefulness in Males

Author

Listed:
  • Ian T. Jones
  • Chance O'Lansen
  • Danielle E. Deros
  • Megan E. Baker
  • Emery K. Thackerson
  • James W. Grice

Abstract

Lin and Frank (2016) failed to replicate findings from a study on self-reflection and vengeance conducted by Exline and colleagues (2008), which reported that males who self-reflected upon their potential for wrongdoing were less likely to seek revenge than males who did not self-reflect. Using novel data methods on Lin and Frank’s data, Grice and colleagues (2017) discovered a multivariate profile that successfully differentiated between the groups of men. The present studies further assess the replicability of Exline and colleagues’ (2008) and Grice and colleagues’ (2017) work. Study 1 failed to replicate any of the findings. Studies 2 and 3 investigate explanations for the failed replications by modifying item response format. Implications and explanations for the unsuccessful replications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian T. Jones & Chance O'Lansen & Danielle E. Deros & Megan E. Baker & Emery K. Thackerson & James W. Grice, 2022. "Parting with the Past: Logical Conceptualizations and Replications of Vengefulness in Males," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 11(02), pages 15-28, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:15-28
    DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.2548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/article/2548
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/pdf/V112022022548.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18483/ijSci.2548?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:15-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Staff ijSciences (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.