Author
Abstract
The objective of the study was to examine the perceptions of the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI) in improving work performance between final-year students and recent graduates. The study employed a quantitative research methodology involving the gathering of quantitative data from two participant groups. The first group consisted of thirty representatives from final-year students across the six university faculties, while the second group comprised thirty recently employed graduates from the same universities. The students were instructed to engage with their peers in the faculties and thereafter evaluate their judgements of the utility of AI, considering both their own perspectives and those of their colleagues. The evaluations were assigned using a semantic differential scale ranging from 1 to 10. The Mann-Whitney test was conducted to determine if the difference in perspectives between the two groups was significant. Engagement in industry and the utilisation of AI enhance perceptions of its utility. Employees were more inclined to believe that AI can improve workplace performance, whereas final-year students expressed scepticism. It is advisable for higher education institutes. Key Words:Artificial intelligence, technological revolution, higher education, work performance, industry
Suggested Citation
Samson Nambei Asoba & Nteboheng Patricia Mefi, 2025.
"Artificial intelligence utility perceptions among South African students and graduates,"
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 7(6), pages 562-568, December.
Handle:
RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:7:y:2025:i:6:p:562-568
DOI: 10.36096/ijbes.v7i6.1031
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:7:y:2025:i:6:p:562-568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibihutr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.