Author
Abstract
The unsuccessful reform of the Political Economy of Zimbabwe (PEZ) syllabus is frequently attributed to the political disputes related to the secondary school curriculum that emerged shortly after independence in the 1980s in Zimbabwe. Such explanations are often incomplete and simplistic, failing to address the critical issues surrounding the symbiotic relationship among stakeholders in education, which are essential for the implementation of reform ideas in classrooms. This paper adopts stakeholder disharmony as a lens to examine and explain the apparent failure of the PEZ curriculum reforms in Zimbabwe. The current research indicates that the failure of the PEZ syllabus can be attributed, in part, to the political contestations surrounding its genealogy, design, and attempted implementation; however, the significant impact of stakeholder disharmony must not be overlooked. Data were gathered via document analysis and semi-structured interviews with key informants from the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education and an official overseeing education in the Catholic Church. The data were utilised to ascertain the causes of the failure and/or stillbirth of the PEZ reform process in Zimbabwe. This account indicates that stakeholder disharmony may be a critical factor in understanding the failure of the PEZ syllabus in Zimbabwe. This paper concludes that, despite numerous reasons proposed to explain the failure of curriculum reforms, the discussions remain incomplete without addressing the role of key stakeholders' inability to find common ground, which has resulted in a detrimental turf war. Key Words:curriculum reform, instructional leadership, Political Economy of Zimbabwe Syllabus
Suggested Citation
Walter Sengai & M.L. Mokhele-Makgalwa, 2025.
"Stakeholder disharmony as lens to examine the failure of the political economy of Zimbabwe syllabus reform agenda,"
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 7(5), pages 545-552, December.
Handle:
RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:7:y:2025:i:5:p:545-552
DOI: 10.36096/ijbes.v7i5.878
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:7:y:2025:i:5:p:545-552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibihutr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.