IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adi/ijbess/v7y2025i4p88-96.html

Challenges faced by women-owned SMEs in Bushbuckridge local municipality A feminist inquiry into structural, cultural, and economic barriers

Author

Listed:
  • Oupa Hlatshwayo

    (University of Limpopo, Department of Public Administration)

  • John Mamokhere

    (University of Limpopo)

Abstract

Traditionally, the business landscape has been male-dominated; however, recent trends indicate a notable rise in female entrepreneurs within rural regions of South Africa. Women-owned small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the Bushbuckridge Local Municipality encounter various challenges, including issues with financing, access to education and training, gender bias, business skills development, and maintaining a work-life balance. Women entrepreneurs frequently encounter challenges in balancing their professional and family obligations due to numerous domestic duties and responsibilities. Their long-term business success may be jeopardised by these challenges. This study seeks to examine the challenges encountered by women-owned SMEs, focussing on the Bushbuckridge Local Municipality as the area of investigation. The investigation employed a qualitative approach to gather and examine the data. The investigation employed a semi-structured interview guide for data collection and utilised a thematic content analysis method to examine both empirical and secondary data. A snowball sampling technique was employed to identify appropriate participants, resulting in the successful sampling of forty (N=40) individuals in 2024. The findings indicated that the majority of participants had achieved their matriculation (grade 12) qualifications; however, they conveyed a desire for further skills and training in entrepreneurship to enhance their business management and growth. A significant number of women reported encountering various forms of discrimination, including being advised to stay at home and care for their husbands and children due to their gender. Women-owned businesses encounter barriers in obtaining resources, networks, and opportunities when compared to their male counterparts. The analysis suggests that businesses owned by women ought to receive equal opportunities as those owned by men. It is essential to enhance the capabilities of women-owned businesses by providing resources including technology, financial support, and training in sustainable business development. In conclusion, the study emphasises the importance of the Bushbuckridge Local Municipality acknowledging the contributions of women-owned SMEs and offering the essential support needed to address unemployment in the region. In the process of awarding tenders, it is essential for municipalities to guarantee the inclusion of women on the board of directors, in accordance with the stipulations set forth by the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act Amendment 42 of 2013. Key Words:Feminist, Gender Discrimination; Entrepreneurship; Resources; Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs); Women-owned businesses

Suggested Citation

  • Oupa Hlatshwayo & John Mamokhere, 2025. "Challenges faced by women-owned SMEs in Bushbuckridge local municipality A feminist inquiry into structural, cultural, and economic barriers," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 7(4), pages 88-96, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:7:y:2025:i:4:p:88-96
    DOI: 10.36096/ijbes.v7i4.887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bussecon.com/ojs/index.php/ijbes/article/view/887/520
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v7i4.887
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36096/ijbes.v7i4.887?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Ebong Ebewo & Cecile Schultz & Mphoreng Magdeline Mmako, 2025. "Towards Inclusive Entrepreneurship: Addressing Constraining and Contributing Factors for Women Entrepreneurs in South Africa," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Alicia Coduras & Erkko Autio, 2013. "Comparing subjective and objective indicators to describe the national entrepreneurial context: the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor and the Global Competitiveness Index contributions," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 26, pages 47-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Longinos Marín & Catalina Nicolás & Alicia Rubio, 2019. "How Gender, Age and Education Influence the Entrepreneur’s Social Orientation: The Moderating Effect of Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Diana Machado & Aldina Correia & Alexandra Braga & Aidin Salamzadeh & Vítor Braga, 2025. "Business Innovation and Internationalisation in Female-Owned Businesses: A Fuzzy-set QCA Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(5), pages 16725-16753, November.
    3. Sonia Vorster & Sebonkile Cynthia Thaba, 2025. "Exploring Funding Options for Female Entrepreneurs in Rural Areas in South Africa," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, September.
    4. S. Aruna Prabha & N. Venkatesa Palanichamy & D. Murugananthi & K. M. Shivakumar & M. Kalpana & M. Balakrishnan, 2025. "Research trends and dynamics in women entrepreneurship: a comprehensive bibliometric review," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Salustiano Martínez-Fierro & José María Biedma-Ferrer & José Ruiz-Navarro, 2016. "Entrepreneurship and strategies for economic development," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 835-851, December.
    6. Burak Erkut, 2016. "Entrepreneurship and Economic Freedom: Do Objective and Subjective Data Reflect the Same Tendencies?," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 4(3), pages 11-26.
    7. Salustiano Martínez‐Fierro & José María Biedma‐Ferrer & José Ruiz‐Navarro, 2020. "Impact of high‐growth start‐ups on entrepreneurial environment based on the level of national economic development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1007-1020, March.
    8. José Carlos Pinho, 2017. "Institutional theory and global entrepreneurship: exploring differences between factor- versus innovation-driven countries," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 56-84, March.
    9. Galindo-Martín, Miguel-Ángel & Castaño-Martínez, María-Soledad & Méndez-Picazo, María-Teresa, 2021. "Effects of the pandemic crisis on entrepreneurship and sustainable development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 345-353.
    10. Dušan Steinhauser, 2022. "Cultural Impact on Economic Freedom in OECD Member Countries," Journal of Economics / Ekonomicky casopis, Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, vol. 70(1), pages 57-75, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:7:y:2025:i:4:p:88-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibihutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.