IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adi/ijbess/v7y2025i4p01-11.html

Marketing and strategic challenges with commercializing acceleration of Small-Growers Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Tony Simphiwe Ngwenya

    (Graduate School of Business and Leadership, University of KwaZulu-Natal)

Abstract

The adoption of plausible strategic marketing deliverables within the sustainable agricultural ecosystem remains a challenge for small-scale growers due to scarce resources and constraint capabilities. The prospects of expediting access to markets and points of sale, which properly established and capacitated enterprises dominate, contain the ability for small-scale growers to commercialise their hard-earned crops and produce. This study unpacks the strategic marketing techniques and tools that small-scale growers could utilize to mitigate their active participation in the complex agricultural business ecosystem. The body of literature explicated various considerations that could be integrated into an attempt to demystify the common challenges and constraints that conform the small growers from the marking mix context and perspective. A positivism-oriented philosophy of the quantitative methodology was utilized in the study to solicit the description of the variables that constitute the elucidation of the strategic phenomenon in the study. The findings revealed that various marketing tools could provide constructive and beneficial advantages for small growers if applied efficaciously and correctly. The findings further indicated that packaging the marketing mixes intervention such as channels, segmenting positioning, channel, target market, and promotion could accelerate the small growers' attainment of sustainable competitive advantage within the broader scope of commercializing their enterprises. Key Words:Marketing Mix, Resources Optimization, Channels, Promotion, Segmenting, Positioning

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Tony Simphiwe Ngwenya, 2025. "Marketing and strategic challenges with commercializing acceleration of Small-Growers Enterprises," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 7(4), pages 01-11, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:7:y:2025:i:4:p:01-11
    DOI: 10.36096/ijbes.v7i4.826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bussecon.com/ojs/index.php/ijbes/article/view/826/511
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v7i4.826
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36096/ijbes.v7i4.826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jay B. Barney, 2018. "Why resource‐based theory's model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(13), pages 3305-3325, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabrizio Rossi & Maretno Agus Harjoto, 2020. "Corporate non-financial disclosure, firm value, risk, and agency costs: evidence from Italian listed companies," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1149-1181, October.
    2. Wei Jiang & Aric Xu Wang & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Chuang Zhang, 2020. "Stakeholder Relationship Capability and Firm Innovation: A Contingent Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 111-125, November.
    3. George Mondela Lukalia, 2025. "Strategic Options of Improving Strategies of Service Delivery by Private Security Firms in Crime Prevention in Nairobi County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(7), pages 2819-2830, July.
    4. Mkansi, Marcia & Nsakanda, Aaron Luntala, 2021. "Leveraging the physical network of stores in e-grocery order fulfilment for sustainable competitive advantage," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Xingmin Ren & Hao Jing & Yaoyao Zhang, 2023. "Construction of Digital Transformation Capability of Manufacturing Enterprises: Qualitative Meta-Analysis Based on Current Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-37, September.
    6. Kate Odziemkowska & Yiying Zhu, 2025. "How Social Movements Catalyze Firm Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 1221-1241, July.
    7. Müller-Stewens, Günter & Stonig, Joachim, 2023. "Auf dem Weg zum Stakeholder-Kapitalismus: Merkmale und Konsequenzen einer sich verändernden institutionellen Logik," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 77(4), pages 316-333.
    8. Ting Qian & Caoyuan Yang, 2023. "State-Owned Equity Participation and Corporations’ ESG Performance in China: The Mediating Role of Top Management Incentives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Linh Nguyen Khanh Duong & Vikas Kumar & Qile He, 2025. "Collaboration for the sustainable food supply chain: A bibliometric analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1287-1301, January.
    10. Wang, Liangcheng & Chen, Yizheng & Li, Wendi, 2025. "Facilitator or figurehead? The impact of academician shareholder on corporate innovation: Evidence from China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. Sandro Cabral & Joseph T. Mahoney & Anita M. McGahan & Matthew Potoski, 2019. "Value creation and value appropriation in public and nonprofit organizations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 465-475, April.
    12. Fairouz Mustafa & Jan Smolarski & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2025. "The Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Sustainability Reporting: A Systematic Review of Applications, Challenges and Future Directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 9761-9784, December.
    13. Iulian Adrian Sorcaru & Mihaela-Carmen Muntean & Ludmila-Daniela Manea & Rozalia Nistor, 2024. "Entrepreneurs′ perceptions of innovation, wine tourism experience, and sustainable wine tourism development: the case of Romanian wineries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 901-934, June.
    14. Vladislav Valentinov & Robert Chia, 2022. "Stakeholder theory: A process‐ontological perspective," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 762-776, July.
    15. Sudarwati & Kartika Hendra Titisari, 2025. "The Role of FinTech and Institutional Quality in Enhancing Economic Readiness amid Climate Risks," Journal Economic Business Innovation, PT. Inovasi Analisis Data, vol. 2(1), pages 14-29.
    16. Yuanyuan Hu & Shouming Chen & Wenchuan Huang, 2023. "Does the market value sustainable supply chain management? New evidence from the outbreak of COVID-19," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(2), pages 366-387, May.
    17. Valentinov, Vladislav & Chia, Robert, 2022. "Stakeholder theory: A process‐ontological perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(3), pages 762-776.
    18. Qiang Li & Minglai Li & Lin Zhang, 2024. "Revisiting the relationship between ESG, institutional ownership, and corporate innovation: An efficiency perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 6504-6525, November.
    19. Shi, Xianwei & Shi, Yongjiang, 2022. "Unpacking the process of resource allocation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    20. Cecilia Varendh-Mansson & Tyler Wry & Ariane Szafarz, 2020. "Anchors Aweigh? Then Time to Head Upstream Why we Need to Theorize “Mission” before “Drift”," Working Papers CEB PostPrintCEB024, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:7:y:2025:i:4:p:01-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibihutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.