IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adi/ijbess/v7y2025i3p58-68.html

Automation breakthrough: the initiative for productivity improvement in a selected automotive assembly organisation in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Walter Dumisani Zondo

    (Durban University of Technology (DUT))

Abstract

Automated flow line manufacturing systems are becoming more relevant in the automotive sector. Improving productivity in the manufacturing system is the core objective of all companies, measured by overall equipment effectiveness (OEE). OEE is a measure of how well a manufacturing operation is utilised compared to its full potential during the periods when it is scheduled to run. Organisations have thus made technological changes in their processes that have led to opportunities for greater flexibilities. This sentiment underpins the concept of automation. Hence, this study examines the impact of automation for productivity improvement in the selected automotive assembly organisation in South Africa. Automation is the creation and application of technology to monitor and control the production and delivery of products and services. The study was quantitative in design and examined production and the related experiences of the automotive assembly organisation that has adopted automation system in its automobile roof process in weld plant for productivity improvement. The Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) model, using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used to analyse data. The company operates in the eThekwini Municipality in KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa. The study was achieved by collecting pre- and post-quarterly data for labour productivity, process efficiency and downtime. The results establish that labour productivity, process efficiency and downtime have a relationship and are statistically significant to company productivity after automation was implemented. It has the potential to reduce errors, increase productivity and augment human capacity. Hence, the original value of this study is its approach in uncovering strengths and weaknesses of automation for productivity improvement in South Africa. Key Words:Automation, Automotive Assembly Organisation, Downtime, Labour Productivity, Process Efficiency, South Africa

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Walter Dumisani Zondo, 2025. "Automation breakthrough: the initiative for productivity improvement in a selected automotive assembly organisation in South Africa," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 7(3), pages 58-68, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:58-68
    DOI: 10.36096/ijbes.v7i3.780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bussecon.com/ojs/index.php/ijbes/article/view/780/469
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v7i3.780
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36096/ijbes.v7i3.780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elfi Baillien & Hans De Witte, 2009. "Why is Organizational Change Related to Workplace Bullying? Role Conflict and Job Insecurity as Mediators," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 30(3), pages 348-371, August.
    2. David H. Autor, 2015. "Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(3), pages 3-30, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghimire, Ramesh & Skinner, Jim & Carnathan, Mike, 2020. "Who perceived automation as a threat to their jobs in metro Atlanta: Results from the 2019 Metro Atlanta Speaks survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Alexander Oluka, 2024. "The impact of digital platforms on traditional market structures," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 2(4(76)), pages 21-29, April.
    3. Ashraf Elsafty & Ahmed Elzeftawy, 2023. "Towards Effective Mitigation of the Digital Transformation and COVID-19 Risk on Unemployment in Mobile Operators in Egypt," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(2), pages 123-123, February.
    4. Cette, Gilbert & Devillard, Aurélien & Spiezia, Vincenzo, 2021. "The contribution of robots to productivity growth in 30 OECD countries over 1975–2019," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Tao Chen & Shuwen Pi & Qing Sophie Wang, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence and Corporate Investment Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Working Papers in Economics 25/05, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    6. Benjamin Meindl & Morgan R. Frank & Joana Mendonc{c}a, 2021. "Exposure of occupations to technologies of the fourth industrial revolution," Papers 2110.13317, arXiv.org.
    7. Shi, Zheng, 2023. "The impact of regional ICT development on job quality of the employee in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6).
    8. Igor Livshits & Ahmad Omar, 2024. "Missed Rent: Path to Eviction or Loan from Landlord?," Economic Insights, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, vol. 9(4), pages 10-18, December.
    9. D. Roderick Kiewiet, 2016. "What’s Right, and What’s Wrong, with “What is Wrong with the West’s Economies?” by Edmund Phelps," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 11-18, August.
    10. Giovanni DOSI & Maria Enrica VIRGILLITO, 2019. "Whither the evolution of the contemporary social fabric? New technologies and old socio‐economic trends," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(4), pages 593-625, December.
    11. Camilla Lenzi & Elisa Panzera, 2022. "The Geography Of The Sharing Economy In Europe," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, DECEMBER.
    12. William G. Resh & Yi Ming & Xinyao Xia & Michael Overton & Gul Nisa Gurbuz & Brandon De Bruhl, 2025. "Complementarity, Augmentation, or Substitutivity? The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on the U.S. Federal Workforce," Papers 2503.09637, arXiv.org.
    13. Martin, John P., 2017. "Policies to Expand Digital Skills for the Machine Age," IZA Policy Papers 123, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Nii-Aponsah, Hubert, 2022. "Automation exposure and implications in advanced and developing countries across gender, age, and skills," MERIT Working Papers 2022-021, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    15. Gunther Tichy, 2016. "Geht der Arbeitsgesellschaft die Arbeit aus?," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 89(12), pages 853-871, December.
    16. Cao, Qiang & Xu, Aiyan & Wang, Jiawen & Yu, Wenmei, 2024. "Influence of financial inclusion and industrial robots on the efficiency of China's OFDI: A heterogeneous spatial stochastic frontier analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 996-1009.
    17. Ayhan, Fatih & Elal, Onuray, 2023. "The IMPACTS of technological change on employment: Evidence from OECD countries with panel data analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    18. Shigeru Fujita & Madison Perry, 2024. "Nonworking Parents or Hungry Children," Economic Insights, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, vol. 9(4), pages 2-9, December.
    19. Tariq Eldakruri & Edip Senyurek, 2025. "Evaluating the Economic Feasibility of Labor Replacement Through Robotics and Automation in Qatar," Papers 2509.10152, arXiv.org.
    20. Bozio, Antoine & Breda, Thomas & Guillot, Malka, 2020. "The Contribution of Payroll Taxation to Wage Inequality in France," IZA Discussion Papers 13317, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:58-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibihutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.