IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adi/ijbess/v7y2025i3p102-113.html

Towards a unified conceptual framework for understanding the entrepreneurship construct

Author

Listed:
  • Arthur Mapanga

    (Walter Sisulu University)

  • Bramwell Kundishora Gavaza

    (Walter Sisulu University)

Abstract

Entrepreneurship is often examined from psychological, social, and economic perspectives. However, this fragmented approach limits our understanding of how these dimensions interact, especially in a world shaped by rapid technological changes and evolving market dynamics. To address this, the Yolk Entrepreneurship Framework was introduced as an integrative model that unifies diverse perspectives. This study employed a conceptual research design and systematically reviewed two decades of literature from leading journals. Through thematic analysis, it explores six key variables: entrepreneurial mindset, sociocultural influences, economic factors, intrapreneurship, sustainable entrepreneurship, and technological advancements. The findings reveal that entrepreneurship is shaped by the dynamic interplay between individual traits and broader contextual factors. Notably, social capital enhances innovation driven by a mindset, highlighting the synergy between internal attributes and external networks. The Yolk Framework visualises these interconnections and promotes a comprehensive view of entrepreneurship. This underscores the need to integrate psychological, sociological, and economic insights to fully grasp the entrepreneurial process. This framework offers a comprehensive lens for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers to understand entrepreneurship as a dynamic, interconnected phenomenon that supports informed research, inclusive policy design, and context-sensitive practice. Key Words:Entrepreneurship; Yolk Entrepreneurship Framework; Entrepreneurial Mindset; social process, intrapreneurship; sustainable entrepreneurship; economic theory; strategic Management

Suggested Citation

  • Arthur Mapanga & Bramwell Kundishora Gavaza, 2025. "Towards a unified conceptual framework for understanding the entrepreneurship construct," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 7(3), pages 102-113, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:102-113
    DOI: 10.36096/ijbes.v7i3.828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bussecon.com/ojs/index.php/ijbes/article/view/828/473
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v7i3.828
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36096/ijbes.v7i3.828?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albérico Travassos Rosário & Ricardo Jorge Raimundo & Sandra P. Cruz, 2022. "Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Schumpeter, Joseph A., 1947. "The Creative Response in Economic History," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 149-159, November.
    3. Robert Wuebker & Todd Zenger & Teppo Felin, 2023. "The theory‐based view: Entrepreneurial microfoundations, resources, and choices," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(12), pages 2922-2949, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vinko Muštra & Blanka Šimundić & Zvonimir Kuliš, 2020. "Does innovation matter for regional labour resilience? The case of EU regions," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 955-970, October.
    2. Andrés Langebaek R. & Diego Vásquez E., 2007. "Determinantes de la actividad innovadora en la industria manufacturera colombiana," Borradores de Economia 433, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    3. Colin Wessendorf & Alexander Kopka & Dirk Fornahl, 2021. "The impact of the six European Key Enabling Technologies (KETs) on regional knowledge creation," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2127, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2021.
    4. Cristiano Antonelli & Giuseppe Scellato, 2011. "Out-of-equilibrium profit and innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 405-421.
    5. Hans-Jürgen Engelbrecht, 2015. "A General Model of the Innovation - Subjective Well-Being Nexus," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & John Foster (ed.), The Evolution of Economic and Innovation Systems, edition 127, pages 69-90, Springer.
    6. Stan Metcalfe, 2012. "J.A. Schumpeter and the Theory of Economic Evolution (One Hundred Years beyond the Theory of Economic Development)," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2012-13, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    7. Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2017. "Les lois de l’imitation et de l’invention : Gabriel Tarde et l’économie évolutionniste de l’innovation," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 68(4), pages 643-671.
    8. Evgeny A. Kuzmin & Elena E. Volkova & Alena V. Fomina, 2019. "Research on the Concentration of Companies in the Electric Power Market of Russia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 130-136.
    9. Alessandra Colombelli & Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro, 2015. "Eco-innovation and firm growth: Do green gazelles run faster? Microeconometric evidence from a sample of European firms," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201516, University of Turin.
    10. Chitsaz, Ehsan & Liang, Dapeng & Khoshsoroor, Somayeh, 2017. "The impact of resource configuration on Iranian technology venture performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 186-195.
    11. Lauri Laine & Ewald Kibler, 2022. "The Social Imaginary of Emancipation in Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(2), pages 393-420, March.
    12. Cristiano Antonelli & Christophe Feder, 2022. "Knowledge properties and the creative response in the global economy: European evidence for the years 1990–2016," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 459-475, April.
    13. Aleksandra Andjelković & Vesna Janković Milić & Marija Radosavljević & Saša Petković & Ditjona Kule & Stojan Debarliev, 2025. "Sustainable Entrepreneurship in the Western Balkan Countries: Key Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2025. "The Soft Budget Constraint: A Theoretical Clarification," Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought, in: The Legacy of Janos Kornai, chapter 0, pages 229-273, Palgrave Macmillan.
    15. Ledenyov, Dimitri O. & Ledenyov, Viktor O., 2015. "Wave function method to forecast foreign currencies exchange rates at ultra high frequency electronic trading in foreign currencies exchange markets," MPRA Paper 67470, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Ankur Chavda & Joshua S. Gans & Scott Stern, 2024. "Theory-Based Entrepreneurial Search," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 397-415, December.
    17. Michelacci, Claudio & Schivardi, Fabiano, 2020. "Are they all like Bill, Mark, and Steve? The education premium for entrepreneurs," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    18. Francesco Quatraro, 2010. "Martin Fransman: the new ICT ecosystem. Implications for Europe," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 321-328, April.
    19. Zoltan J. Acs & Bo Carlsson & Pontus Braunerhjelm & David B. Audretsch, "undated". "The Missing Link," Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy 2005-08, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy Group.
    20. Takayuki Nagato, 2024. "Designing a Tax System that Encourages Innovation in Start-ups," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 20(1), pages 1-33, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:102-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibihutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.