IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adi/bsrsss/v7y2025i1id709.html

The effect of public procurement processes on the performance of public projects

Author

Listed:
  • Mahongo Katamuna
  • Bupe Getrude Mutono-Mwanza
  • Erastus Mwanaumo

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of public procurement procedures on the efficacy of public projects within Zambia's Ministry of Infrastructure, Housing and Urban Development (MIHUD) and the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development (MLGRD). Inefficient procurement methods, characterised by delays, cost overruns, and inferior project quality, have impeded the successful execution of public projects, especially in infrastructure and rural development. The research is to evaluate the impact of Supplier Qualification Screening (SQS), Competitive Bidding (CB), and Supplier Evaluation (SE) on project performance. A quantitative research methodology was utilised, employing a survey-based descriptive design to gather data from 120 procurement experts and project managers within the designated ministries. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was employed to examine the correlations between procurement methods and project outcomes. The results demonstrate that SQS and CB enhance project performance by facilitating timely delivery and cost effectiveness. Nonetheless, SE exerted a detrimental impact, indicating that too rigorous evaluation processes may result in delays and impede project accomplishment. Hypothesis testing validated these findings, corroborating the alternative hypotheses for SQS and CB, however SE demonstrated an inverse correlation with project outcomes. The report advocates for the fortification of regulatory frameworks, the augmentation of capacity-building programs, the rectification of bureaucratic inefficiencies, and the encouragement of e-procurement platform usage to enhance procurement efficiency. A review of supplier evaluation procedures is essential to avert needless delays in project execution. The study's results have substantial implications for procurement reforms and efficiency enhancements in Zambia. Improving openness, accountability, and stakeholder collaboration in procurement procedures can result in superior project outcomes, fostering national infrastructure development and socio-economic advancement, especially in rural regions. Enhancing procurement policies and using digital solutions will be crucial in developing a more efficient and accountable public procurement system.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahongo Katamuna & Bupe Getrude Mutono-Mwanza & Erastus Mwanaumo, 2025. "The effect of public procurement processes on the performance of public projects," Bussecon Review of Social Sciences (2687-2285), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 7(1), pages 68-78, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:adi:bsrsss:v:7:y:2025:i:1:id:709
    DOI: 10.36096/brss.v7i1.709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bussecon.com/ojs/index.php/brss/article/view/709
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bussecon.com/ojs/index.php/brss/article/download/709/418
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36096/brss.v7i1.709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adi:bsrsss:v:7:y:2025:i:1:id:709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Alireza Ghezel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibihutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.