IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acl/journl/y2019id279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Opinion In Russia, Usa, Other Countries On Risks And Benefits Of International Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Evgeny V. Emelianov

Abstract

The paper examines the public’s attitude towards trade with other countries, employing comparative analysis of the polls’ results of the Surveys conducted across 27 countries. The research highlights the attitude of respondents concerning the influence of international trade on the key national economic indicators, whether growing trade and business ties good for their country, how the respondents view the influence of trade with other countries on cutting/creating jobs. InRussiamore respondents consider trade raises than lowering prices. Special attention is paid on how respondents view the influence of trade with other countries on cutting and creating jobs. American respondents twice as likely to respond trade is good for their country as to believe it creates jobs or raises wages. Comparing with previous years polls, the last year poll shows much fewer Americans believe that trade with other countries leads to cutting jobs. While in US more respondents answer that trade leads to creation jobs, inMexicoand some other countries less respondents think so.

Suggested Citation

  • Evgeny V. Emelianov, 2019. "Public Opinion In Russia, Usa, Other Countries On Risks And Benefits Of International Trade," International Trade and Trade Policy, ФГБОУ ВО "Ð Ð¾Ñ Ñ Ð¸Ð¹Ñ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾Ð¼Ð¸Ñ‡ÐµÑ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ ÑƒÐ½Ð¸Ð²ÐµÑ€Ñ Ð¸Ñ‚ÐµÑ‚ им. Г.Ð’. Плеханова", issue 1.
  • Handle: RePEc:acl:journl:y:2019:id:279
    DOI: 10.21686/2410-7395-2019-1-95-104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mttp.rea.ru/jour/article/viewFile/279/227
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21686/2410-7395-2019-1-95-104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acl:journl:y:2019:id:279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Латышов Рртём Ð’Ñ Ñ‡ÐµÑ Ð»Ð°Ð²Ð¾Ð²Ð¸Ñ‡ (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rea.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.