IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acl/journl/y2017id199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European Union: 6 0 Years Of Progress

Author

Listed:
  • R. I. Khasbulatov
  • T. E. Migaleva
  • L. V. Achalova
  • A. R. Byasharova

Abstract

The article is devoted to the review of the results of the development of the EEU-EU integration group for 60 years after the signing of the Treaty of Rome in March 1957. The dramatic situation that emerged after the victorious conclusion of the Second World War over Nazi Germany and its allies is reminiscent of the hopelessness, need and desperation of the European peoples, it seemed, lost their future. One after another, various political projects of European unification failed. The evolution of the established European Economic Community (EEC) on the basis of the European  Coal  and  Steel  Community  (ECSC)  is  traced.  Stages  are highlighted such as the signing of the Paris and Rome treaties that created the integration group, as well as the Maastricht Summit, which renamed the EEC to the European Union. Among other decisions, indicated the accelerated expansion of the Union at the expense of the former socialist countries of Eastern Europe and the Union republics of the USSR, which led to increased contradictions. This factor led to the UK's exit from the EU. Questions about the prospects of the European Union were touched upon.

Suggested Citation

  • R. I. Khasbulatov & T. E. Migaleva & L. V. Achalova & A. R. Byasharova, 2017. "European Union: 6 0 Years Of Progress," International Trade and Trade Policy, ФГБОУ ВО "Ð Ð¾Ñ Ñ Ð¸Ð¹Ñ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾Ð¼Ð¸Ñ‡ÐµÑ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ ÑƒÐ½Ð¸Ð²ÐµÑ€Ñ Ð¸Ñ‚ÐµÑ‚ им. Г.Ð’. Плеханова", issue 3.
  • Handle: RePEc:acl:journl:y:2017:id:199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mttp.rea.ru/jour/article/viewFile/199/155
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acl:journl:y:2017:id:199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Латышов Рртём Ð’Ñ Ñ‡ÐµÑ Ð»Ð°Ð²Ð¾Ð²Ð¸Ñ‡ (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rea.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.