IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ack/journl/yid119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Strong and Weak Participants in the Multipurpose Engineering Projects and the Problem of Dividing the Common Expenditures (The Case Study of the Virtual Water Project)

Author

Listed:
  • L. B. Sheynin

Abstract

The method of dividing common expenditures for water project, which is proportional to the volumes of water, assigned for each participant of the project, it can’t be applied to the participants having no relation to the water (for example, the railroad (or the railways) put along the dam comb). Other methods for distributing total costs are based on different indices of participants’ benefits, such as: 1) the absolute efficiency attained by each participant and 2) the relative efficiency attained by each participant and resulted from the fact that a part of total costs is taken by other participants. The author suggests applying the first index to the so-called strong participants, while applying the second one to the so-called weak participants. He pays attention to the problem of dividing common and particular expenditures of different participants.

Suggested Citation

  • L. B. Sheynin, 0. "The Strong and Weak Participants in the Multipurpose Engineering Projects and the Problem of Dividing the Common Expenditures (The Case Study of the Virtual Water Project)," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, issue 1.
    • Handle: RePEc:ack:journl:y::id:119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ecr-journal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/119/118
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ack:journl:y::id:119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.