IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ack/journl/y2026id1182.html

Assessing the intellectual maturity of industrial systems: integration of concepts and tools

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana A. Gileva

  • Ivan A. Babkin

Abstract

Increasing the level of production intellectualization is a current trend and a strategic priority of modern industrial development. Managing the development of intellectual production requires appropriate tools, one of which is a maturity assessment model. Research for defining intellectual maturity was conducted for several decades within various scientific disciplines. Therefore, the aim of this article is to develop a methodological approach for assessing the intellectual maturity of industrial systems in the data economy, based on the analysis and integration of various assessment concepts and tools. The evolution and specific features of various approaches and models for assessing intellectual maturity are presented: concepts of intellectual capital and knowledge management, maturity assessment models for Industry X.0, smart manufacturing, artificial intelligence, prospects for the development of industrial metaverses and ecosystems. The most common assessment areas within each approach are identified. The feasibility of building a model of an industrial system’s intellectual maturity in the form of a dynamic complex of sub-models is substantiated, allowing for its structure to be customized depending on the context of a specific enterprise. The strategic goals of the enterprise are highlighted as a key contextual factor determining the priority areas and depth of assessment for each of them. Specific principles for assessing intellectual maturity are formulated: strategic alignment, hierarchy, continuity, integration, redundancy, faceted choice, contextual intellectualization of design, quantification, convergence, and proactivity. A conceptual model for assessing the intellectual maturity of industrial systems is proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana A. Gileva & Ivan A. Babkin, 2026. "Assessing the intellectual maturity of industrial systems: integration of concepts and tools," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 29(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ack:journl:y:2026:id:1182
    DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2026-29(1)-123-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ecr-journal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1182/665
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33293/1609-1442-2026-29(1)-123-136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valentyna SEMENOVA & Oleksandr LITVINOV & Volodymyr YERMACHENKO & Vlastimil VICEN & Edita HAJNISOVA, 2025. "Identification and assessment of the components of the enterprise's intellectual capital," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 6(2), pages 336-356, April.
    2. Chao Liu & Qichen Liao & Wenyan Gao & Shuxian Li & Peng Jiang & Ding Li, 2024. "Intellectual Capital Evaluation Index Based on a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Technique," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ack:journl:y:2026:id:1182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.