Author
Listed:
- Alexander V. Kudrov
- Yuriy V. Gavrilets
Abstract
The article presents findings in a longitudinal study on the psychological adaptation of the population during the shock period triggered by the special military operation (2022). Using a sample of 313 respondents across six consecutive survey waves and employing probabilistic-statistical modeling methods, the dynamics of psychological well-being and coping strategies were analyzed. Two stable structural clusters of psychological indicators emerged: overall psychological well-being (comprising emotional, social, and personal components) and constructive coping (including positive reappraisal, acceptance, and humor). Composite indices were constructed for each cluster, revealing distinct dynamics: relative stability in “well-being†versus a significant decline in “coping†following the announcement of partial mobilization. Four distinct trajectory types were identified for each index, forming “mirror-image†pairs. Membership in a specific adaptation type was not determined by socio-demographic factors (gender, age, education, income) but was associated with initial socio-psychological attitudes. Using econometric models of nested dichotomies, statistical predictors of adaptation were identified: “trust in institutions,†“social optimism,†“identity-related attitudes,†and “cognitive strategies.†The study demonstrates that, under crisis conditions, individual adaptation trajectories are statistically predictable based on psychological attitudes measured during the initial survey period, highlighting the role of these initial attitudes as predictors of future adaptation.
Suggested Citation
Alexander V. Kudrov & Yuriy V. Gavrilets, 2026.
"Experience in statistical modeling of population psychological state dynamics during critical situations,"
Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 29(1).
Handle:
RePEc:ack:journl:y:2026:id:1165
DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2026-29(1)-29-43
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ack:journl:y:2026:id:1165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.