IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ack/journl/y2019id332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Dilemma of Modern Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Olga E. Bessonova

Abstract

The article attempts to answer the question of what socioeconomic system is causing in the depths of evolution, and explain, why the contractual model provides the conditions for entering a new economic development stage. The conceptual basis of this is the synthesis of the author's razdatok theory with modern institutional concepts. The result of the rethinking of institutional evolution was the conclusion that the confrontation between market and razdatok (non-market, distributive) economies is replaced on integration of market and razdatok institutions in the 21st century. Therefore, the institutional dilemma is not a plan or a market, and not socialism or capitalism, but a quasi–market or contractual razdatok. Outwardly, both models look similar – resources are distributed through state orders on a competitive basis and contracts are concluded with legal guarantees. However, the quasi-market is based on the extractive synthesis, and protects the monopoly acquisition of public rent by a narrow group of individuals. Whereas the model of contractual razdatok, being a result from inclusive synthesis and the mechanism for the functioning of a social state, ensures the effective inclusion of all social groups in the process of economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga E. Bessonova, 2019. "Institutional Dilemma of Modern Russia," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, issue 4.
  • Handle: RePEc:ack:journl:y:2019:id:332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ecr-journal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/332/266
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ack:journl:y:2019:id:332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.