IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acf/journl/y2026id2869.html

Opinion Leader Identification for Artificial Intelligence Domain Analysis Using a Graph-Based Model

Author

Listed:
  • O. A. Shutko

  • A. V. Poptsov
  • V. D. Oliseenko

Abstract

This paper addresses the challenge of navigating the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence (AI), using large language models as a representative example. It proposes a graph-based representation of the scientific community as an analytical tool for describing the structure of relationships between researchers and identifying research groups. The study also introduces an approach for detecting key figures and opinion leaders within the field. The underlying assumption is that analyzing the publications of such groups can help capture emerging trends in a timely manner and support informed decisions regarding the adoption and implementation of relevant technologies. Using this approach, a graph model was constructed based on open scientometric data: researchers are represented as nodes with additional attributes, while their relationships are encoded as edges. The influence of individual authors was quantified using PageRank centrality, and latent research groups were identified through the Louvain clustering algorithm. The results support the initial hypotheses: scholars with high PageRank scores are indeed recognized industry leaders, and the algorithm consistently identifies five clusters corresponding to real research and corporate structures. Overall, the proposed graph model can be considered a supporting tool for analytical characterization of the current AI research landscape and for monitoring emerging scientific trends.

Suggested Citation

  • O. A. Shutko & A. V. Poptsov & V. D. Oliseenko, 2026. "Opinion Leader Identification for Artificial Intelligence Domain Analysis Using a Graph-Based Model," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 6.
  • Handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2026:id:2869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/2869/2086
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Brynjolfsson & Danielle Li & Lindsey Raymond, 2025. "Generative AI at Work," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(2), pages 889-942.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saurabh Amin & Amine Bennouna & Daniel Huttenlocher & Dingwen Kong & Liang Lyu & Asuman Ozdaglar, 2026. "A Bayesian Framework for Human-AI Collaboration: Complementarity and Correlation Neglect," Papers 2602.14331, arXiv.org.
    2. Wensu Li & Atin Aboutorabi & Harry Lyu & Kaizhi Qian & Martin Fleming & Brian C. Goehring & Neil Thompson, 2026. "Economics of Human and AI Collaboration: When is Partial Automation More Attractive than Full Automation?," Papers 2603.29121, arXiv.org.
    3. William G. Resh & Yi Ming & Xinyao Xia & Michael Overton & Gul Nisa Gurbuz & Brandon De Bruhl, 2025. "Complementarity, Augmentation, or Substitutivity? The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on the U.S. Federal Workforce," Papers 2503.09637, arXiv.org.
    4. Hyunso Kim & Hyo Kang & Jaeyong Song, 2026. "Generative AI Fuels Solo Entrepreneurship, but Teams Still Lead at the Top," Papers 2605.10291, arXiv.org.
    5. Michelle Yin & Burhan Ogut, 2026. "Who Uses AI? Platform Selection and the Measurement of Occupational AI Exposure," Papers 2605.21743, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    6. Jin, Zhuo & Zhou, Zhixiang & Wu, Huaqing, 2025. "Enhancing digital manufacturing efficiency and dominance relation driven big Data analytics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    7. Christina Gathmann & Felix Grimm & Erwin Winkler, 2024. "AI, Task Changes in Jobs, and Worker Reallocation," CESifo Working Paper Series 11585, CESifo.
    8. Foucart, Renaud & Zeng, Fanqi & Wang, Shidong, 2025. "The Social Importance of Being Stubborn When an Organization Meets AI," SocArXiv nfgy3_v1, Center for Open Science.
    9. Wenjun Cao, 2025. "Black Box Absorption: LLMs Undermining Innovative Ideas," Papers 2510.20612, arXiv.org.
    10. Abendroth Dias Kulani & Arias Patricia & Bacco F. Manlio & Bassani Elias & Bertoletti Alice & Bertolini Lorenzo & Bertrand Astrid & Bili Danai & Boucher Philip & Cachia Romina & Ceresa Mario & Chaslot, 2025. "Generative AI Outlook Report," JRC Research Reports JRC142598, Joint Research Centre.
    11. Zara Contractor & Germ'an Reyes, 2025. "Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College," Papers 2508.00717, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    12. Cheng, Qiang & Lin, Pengkai & Zhao, Yue, 2025. "Does generative AI facilitate investor Trading? Early evidence from ChatGPT outages," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(2).
    13. Michael Blank & Gregor Schubert & Miao Ben Zhang, 2026. "The Household Impact of Generative AI: Evidence from Internet Browsing Behavior," Papers 2603.03144, arXiv.org.
    14. Gmyrek, Pawel, & Viollaz, Mariana, & Winkler, Hernan,, 2026. "Disruption without dividend? how the digital divide and task differences split GenAI’s global impact," ILO Working Papers 995694369002676, International Labour Organization.
    15. Christos Makridis & Christos A. Makridis, 2026. "The Sum of All (Workplace) Fears: How Managers Mediate the Fear of AI Job Displacement," CESifo Working Paper Series 12678, CESifo.
    16. Aran Nayebi, 2025. "An AI Capability Threshold for Rent-Funded Universal Basic Income in an AI-Automated Economy," Papers 2505.18687, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    17. Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Queiroz, Maciel M. & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Shi, Chunming (Victor), 2023. "Are both generative AI and ChatGPT game changers for 21st-Century operations and supply chain excellence?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    18. Chen, Xiaoxiao & Yang, Jiayi & Wu, Bo, 2025. "How is artificial intelligence shaping the labor demand of firms? ——evidence from text-mining analysis of listed companies," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(10).
    19. Aldasoro, I. & Gambacorta, L. & Korinek, A. & Shreeti, V. & Stein, M., 2025. "Intelligent financial system: How AI is transforming finance," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    20. Christoph Riedl & Eric Bogert, 2024. "Who Benefits from AI? Self-Selection, Skill Gap, and the Hidden Costs of AI Feedback," Papers 2409.18660, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2026:id:2869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sziu.ranepa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.