IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acf/journl/y2022id1944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The US-China Trade War in the Context of Deglobalization and the Re-ideologization of International Relations (Part 1)

Author

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the causes, manifestations, circumstances, results and global consequences of US-China trade war in 2018–2021. Based on the analysis of management decisions, expert assessments, statistics and opinion polls, the author makes judgments and assumptions about the continuity of US policy, provoking and aggravating conflict relations between the two countries, as well as contributing to their penetration into all spheres of politics, economy, culture and even sports. At the same time, consistent and adequate measures on the part of the People’s Republic of China, which have a predominantly defensive orientation, are taken into account. At the same time, the anti-Chinese trade, investment, and technology policy, which was already carried out under Donald Trump in the name of ensuring the national security of the United States, and under Joe Biden actually turned into a hybrid cold war, is interpreted in the context of causal relationships characterizing the crisis of the neoliberal model of capitalism and the intentions of the world elite to restart the Bretton Woods system by switching to “green†energy. The most important resource of the transformation that has begun is the ideology of justifying any sanctions and other strong-willed decisions of the “democratic†Western states led by the United States against the “authoritarian†losers of the energy transition. Consequently, the “trade war†of the USA and China, objectively acting as an instrument of disorganization of the global world and a powerful limiter of globalization based on “market fundamentalism†, becomes the demiurge of the new globalization projected on the platform of “ideological fundamentalism†. In the situation of a multipolar world and the intensified rivalry of nuclear powers, restarting the world economy through a global war seems impossible. On the contrary, the mechanism of collecting a “green†contribution in favor of potential beneficiaries of the new globalization has not yet been tested. Within this perspective, the US-China trade war becomes not only an existential concern of the US and its allies, but also a problem of China’s survival. Obviously, this circumstance explains the emerging rapprochement between the PRC and the Russian Federation in the direction of pooling resources and forming a military-political alliance.

Suggested Citation

  • M. M. Shumilov, 2022. "The US-China Trade War in the Context of Deglobalization and the Re-ideologization of International Relations (Part 1)," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 4.
  • Handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2022:id:1944
    DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2022-4-19-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1944/1578
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-4-19-34?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Al. A. Gromyko, 2020. "The Pandemic and the Crisis in the System of International Relations," Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 13(5).
    2. Svetlana Viktorovna Rimkevich & Yuri Anatolievich Savinov, 2019. "Economic sanctions as a trade war tool in telecom equipment market," Russian Foreign Economic Journal, Russian Foreign Trade Academy Ministry of economic development of the Russian Federation, issue 7, pages 75-89, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2022:id:1944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Рнтонова Ð•Ð²Ð³ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð’Ð»Ð°Ð´Ð¸Ð¼Ð¸Ñ€Ð¾Ð²Ð½Ð° (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sziu.ranepa.ru .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.