IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acf/journl/y2020id1468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Old-age Pension Policy in China and Russia: the Common and the Specific

Author

Listed:
  • Tianhong Chen

Abstract

In the process of transforming from planned economy to market economy, both China and Russia faced the issue of pension reform. There are similarities in the reform and development process and the system model of the pension security system in China and Russia. Transition from planned economy to market economy and aggravation of population aging are main reasons for the reform of pension system in both countries. Under the influence of the World Bank and other international organizations, China and Russia have gradually established a multi-tier pension system, with the state, enterprises and individuals sharing the pension costs. Differences also exist in the old-age security system of China and Russia.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianhong Chen, 2020. "Comparison of Old-age Pension Policy in China and Russia: the Common and the Specific," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 7.
    • Handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2020:id:1468
    DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2020-7-68-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1468/1269
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-7-68-82?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2020:id:1468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Рнтонова Ð•Ð²Ð³ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð’Ð»Ð°Ð´Ð¸Ð¼Ð¸Ñ€Ð¾Ð²Ð½Ð° (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sziu.ranepa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.