IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acf/journl/y2018id888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

USSR and Contemporary USA: Two Paradigms of the Social Development Deadlock

Author

Listed:
  • K. A. Kaveev

Abstract

This article contains reflections of the author about two essentially different approaches by the ways of historical social development: liberal and socialist, each of which has provided social progress on a certain interval of time, at the same time, in process of realization and in different degree, each of them was deadlock. The author claims that without consideration of features and specific conditions of historical development of the countries, instilment of the way of social development, brings eventually to the deadlock. The author believes that only following to the natural course of social development of the concrete countries, without his artificial acceleration and taking into account positive experience what offers concrete way, the social progress of the concrete country and state can be provided.

Suggested Citation

  • K. A. Kaveev, 2018. "USSR and Contemporary USA: Two Paradigms of the Social Development Deadlock," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., vol. 1(7).
    • Handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2018:id:888
    DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2018-7-111-116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/888/877
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-7-111-116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2018:id:888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Рнтонова Ð•Ð²Ð³ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð’Ð»Ð°Ð´Ð¸Ð¼Ð¸Ñ€Ð¾Ð²Ð½Ð° (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sziu.ranepa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.