Author
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analyses of main problems and results of administrative reforms in Russia during the transition period (since 1985) from the Soviet administrative system to the actual administrative structure. The basis for it is the model developed by German researches H. Wollmann and S. Kuhlmann and included by them into the textbook «Administra tion and administrative reforms in Europe» one part of which in Russian translation is published in the 11th and 12th issues of this journal. The core of the book builds the administrative reforms analysis approach consisting of three stages (institutions, processes, final effects) and based on the actual new institutionalism theories. The author of the article sees such approach as a possibility for in depth analyses of the reforming process in Russia and development of a further reconfiguration conceptions for the Russian administrative system with the goal to rationalize its structure, optimize main processes, to get positive final effects. As one of the main difficulties during the reform the author together with other researchers sees in the rational bureaucracy experience absence in Russia connected also with a lack of appropriate normative and administrative culture. The influence of these factors is stressed in the conceptions of the historical and sociological institutionalism. The same negative factors put obstacles in the way of new managerial instruments usage seen as the most efficient and effective modernization stimulus for a rational administration by the new public management model in a frame of the institutionalism based on the rational choice theory. The actual administrative reform results are evaluated by the author in a whole as insufficient and requiring further correction.
Suggested Citation
R. M. Vulfovich, 2018.
"Administrative Reforms in Post-Soviet Russia: Principal Problems and Results,"
Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 12.
Handle:
RePEc:acf:journl:y:2018:id:740
DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2017-12-102-110
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2018:id:740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sziu.ranepa.ru .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.