IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aca/journl/y2023id450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Madhhabs in the Islamic law. Comparative legal analysis

Author

Listed:
  • B. A. Antonov

Abstract

The author undertakes an attempt to conduct a comparative legal analysis of four Sunni madhhabs which are traditionally in practice in most Islamic states. The occurrence in early Islam of legal doctrines that later became the basis for the development of madhhabs was generated by the need to adapt the main propositions presented in Quran and Sunna to the new historical, socio-economic and political conditions that existed in the Muslim world by the end of the 7th century. The need to resolve issues of Muslim law (fiqh) at the same time demanded to apply the additional sources (hadiths) and to develop special methodology of working with them. Most hadiths were interpreted by the Sunni differently what became an additional reason for creating systematic doctrines that, while distributing and canonizing the Sunni fiqh, were called madhhabs.In the modern world, madhhabs keep playing a considerable role not only in the Islamic law but also in the everyday life of the ummah: mistakes made by ordinary Muslims (who are not aware of the correct interpretation of the Quran or Sunna) while construing this or that hadith or ayat are fraught with both, violating the rules of behavior and serious religious conflicts. And finally, it is by means of madhhabs that the fiqh principles mould the Islamic law into a coherent legal system.

Suggested Citation

  • B. A. Antonov, 2023. "Madhhabs in the Islamic law. Comparative legal analysis," RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law, Russian State University for the Humanities (RSUH), issue 1.
  • Handle: RePEc:aca:journl:y:2023:id:450
    DOI: 10.28995/2073-6304-2023-1-113-132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economics.rsuh.ru/jour/article/viewFile/450/382
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.28995/2073-6304-2023-1-113-132?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aca:journl:y:2023:id:450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.