IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aca/journl/y2021id338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efciency assessment of the improvement of working conditions and safety programs

Author

Listed:
  • V. A. Umnov
  • O. S. Korobova
  • T. V. Mikhina

Abstract

The efciency assessment of the improvement in working conditions and safety programs of mining regions was done by taking into account the quality of studying the program document in terms of its compliance with the recommendations of the Standard Program, the comprehensiveness of coverage and the correct planning of the target indicators, fnancial support for program activities and the implementation of the program document. In the ranking of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in terms of the effectiveness of those programs, the top ten constituent entities of the Russian Federation that most successfully implement the program-targeted administration method in the feld of labor protection on their territory include Amur and Kemerovo regions from coal mining regions; the top ten outsiders are the republics of Komi and Buryatia, the Sverdlovsk, Sakhalin regions and the Chukotka Autonomous Region. The greatest successes in comparison with 2017 were achieved in reducing economic losses and costs associated with the loss of working time due to industrial accidents and employment in harmful and (or) dangerous working conditions. In 2017, an increase in losses was observed in every second coal-mining region, while in 2018 – just in fve (Republic Tyva, Irkutsk, Sakhalin oblasts, Jewish Autonomous oblast and Chukotka Autonomous okrug).

Suggested Citation

  • V. A. Umnov & O. S. Korobova & T. V. Mikhina, 2021. "Efciency assessment of the improvement of working conditions and safety programs," RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law, Russian State University for the Humanities (RSUH), issue 3 ч. 2.
  • Handle: RePEc:aca:journl:y:2021:id:338
    DOI: 10.28995/2073-6304-2021-3-249-259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economics.rsuh.ru/jour/article/viewFile/338/313
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.28995/2073-6304-2021-3-249-259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aca:journl:y:2021:id:338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.