IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aca/journl/y2019id181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The legal system of Germany in 1933–1945: mentality in the categories of a concrete order

Author

Listed:
  • B. A. Antonov

Abstract

The essence of any legal system in the concrete state depends on what is actually recognized in it as the main source of law.The sources of the national-socialist law traditionally were the types of standard legal thinking. The best-known model of such standardization is mentality [in the categories] of a concrete order (konkretes Ordnungsdenken ,with its aim as not so far to excuse a crime but rather to publicly “glorify†a criminal as a result of which the latter seemed a superman (Ãœbermensch) to himself and the others. It was such type of thinking that was subject to formation, which, in turn, stemmed from three proceeding sources, that is: theory of probability, Maurice Hauriou’s theory of judicial institutionalism and theory of judicial Neo-Hegelianism. Within the above mentioned theories, the author attempts to analyze the conception of subhuman combining it with such methods of enforcement as the general clauses relating to the legal system of the Third Reich that derives from the Holy Vehmic courts (Femgericht) (also spelt Feme), the tribunal system in Germany during the late Middle Ages.After the analysis having been done the author came to the conclusion that the legal system and political ideology of the Third Reich was aimed at the formation of the standard national mentality that defined people’s behavior in the direction desired for German Nazism.Â

Suggested Citation

  • B. A. Antonov, 2019. "The legal system of Germany in 1933–1945: mentality in the categories of a concrete order," RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law, Russian State University for the Humanities (RSUH), issue 2.
  • Handle: RePEc:aca:journl:y:2019:id:181
    DOI: 10.28995/2073-6304-2019-2-128-146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economics.rsuh.ru/jour/article/viewFile/181/179
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.28995/2073-6304-2019-2-128-146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aca:journl:y:2019:id:181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.