IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abz/journl/y2026id650.html

Systemic analysis of the publication environment and dissertation outcomes in the training of highly qualified research personnel in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • V. E. Kovalev

  • E. A. Antineskul

  • E. V. Sokolova

Abstract

The challenges associated with the training of highly qualified research personnel in contemporary Russia are linked to the transformation of postgraduate education as an institutional mechanism for reproducing research and academic staff, the contraction of the higher education talent pool, declining dissertation outcomes, and persistent interregional disparities in research capacity. However, the relationship between the parameters of the publication environment shaped by academic degree attestation requirements and the configuration of the Higher Attestation Commission (HAC/VAK) List of peer-reviewed journals and dissertation outcomes remains insufficiently examined quantitatively. The aim of this study is to develop an analytical framework for the systemic assessment of the publication environment and its statistical association with dissertation outcomes amid the transformation of the regulatory framework governing academic degree attestation. The study proposes a set of open-data indicators for assessing the conditions of dissertation preparation based on publication activity in VAK-listed journals and regional trends in successfully defended dissertations, using eLIBRARY.RU data for 2015–2024. Official statistical and regulatory materials were additionally used to characterize the institutional and staffing contexts. The methodological framework comprises descriptive statistics, concentration measures, linear trend analysis, year-on-year changes, correlation analysis, and quartile grouping. The findings reveal a high degree of interregional concentration in research publication activity, predominantly downward trajectories in the number of defended dissertations and research personnel, and a simultaneous upward trend in R&D expenditure. A statistical association is established between publication and authorship indicators and the number of successfully defended dissertations. At the journal level, the analysis identifies a declining share of new authors and an increase in their average age. The practical significance of the study lies in the development of an approach to monitoring the publication environment and the associated conditions of dissertation preparation, taking into account the regulatory requirements governing academic degree attestation.

Suggested Citation

  • V. E. Kovalev & E. A. Antineskul & E. V. Sokolova, 2026. "Systemic analysis of the publication environment and dissertation outcomes in the training of highly qualified research personnel in Russia," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 12(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:abz:journl:y:2026:id:650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecna.elpub.ru/jour/article/viewFile/650/349
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Quan & Fei Shu & Meijia Yang & Vincent Larivière, 2023. "Publish and flourish: investigating publication requirements for PhD students in China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(12), pages 6675-6693, December.
    2. Ahmad Fawzi Shamsi & Ulker Vanci Osam, 2022. "Challenges and Support in Article Publication: Perspectives of Non-Native English Speaking Doctoral Students in a “Publish or No Degree†Context," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Moxin & Wang, Yang, 2025. "Affiliation homogeneity and scientific impact: A comparative study across nations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    2. Wu, Dengsheng & Wang, Shuwen & Xu, Weixuan & Li, Jianping, 2024. "Do conference-journal articles receive more citations? A case study in physics," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abz:journl:y:2026:id:650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://delo.ranepa.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.