IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abw/journl/y2017id704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodology of expert evaluation of effectiveness of methods of organizational diagnostics

Author

Listed:
  • T. V. CHIBIKOVA

Abstract

The article is devoted to the actual problem of assessing the effectiveness of consulting methods. Management consulting is a developing sphere of human activity. The technique of an estimation of efficiency of methods of organizational diagnostics is offered. The research was based on the problem of assessing the effectiveness of diagnostic methods in consulting using only economic indicators. According to the methodology, during the evaluation, the effectiveness of methods is is assessed in the light of costs and results, both should be similarly broken down into a number of elements. These elements were to be evaluated by experts. To confirm the validity of the results obtained, statistical indicators are used: variance of a random variable, standard deviation and coefficient of variation, which confirm (or disprove) the results of an expert poll.To approbate the methodology, a survey of experts elected among employees of consulting companies in Omsk was conducted. The survey data was analyzed. Based on the results of the analysis, the validity of the obtained survey results and the possibility of their practical application was concluded. The practical significance of the study is that it is possible to apply the methodology of interviewing experts in practice. The purpose of such surveys will be a regular reassessment and identification of the need for specific consulting methods for certain methods of organizational diagnostics.

Suggested Citation

  • T. V. Chibikova, 2017. "Methodology of expert evaluation of effectiveness of methods of organizational diagnostics," Strategic decisions and risk management, Real Economy Publishing House, issue 4-5.
  • Handle: RePEc:abw:journl:y:2017:id:704
    DOI: 10.17747/2078-8886-2017-4-5-38-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jsdrm.ru/jour/article/viewFile/704/609
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17747/2078-8886-2017-4-5-38-43?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abw:journl:y:2017:id:704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ООО Ð˜Ð·Ð´Ð°Ñ‚ÐµÐ»ÑŒÑ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ дом Â«Ð ÐµÐ°Ð»ÑŒÐ½Ð°Ñ Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾Ð¼Ð¸ÐºÐ°Â» (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.jsdrm.ru/jour/about/journalSponsorship .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.