IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v9y2005i2380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Avaliação de métodos de exigência de capital para risco de ações no Brasil

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo Silva Araújo
  • João Maurício de Souza Moreira
  • Ricardo dos Santos Maia Clemente

Abstract

This paper analyses four methods of calculating capital requirements for coverage of market risk due to exposure in stocks and their derivatives, except options. For simulation purposes, two theoretical portfolios are created with assets that participate in the composition of Ibovespa. The methods evaluated follow the directives of the Basel Committee. The first is based on the standardized approach and the others, on the internal models approach based on the Value-at-Risk (VaR) concept. The VaR methods evaluated are historical, Diagonal and the RiskmetricsTMapproach. The backtesting of the methods follows the methodology suggested by the Committee. Additionally, for the methods based on VaR, it is applied the Kupiec test for proportion of failures. The relevance of the difference between the capital required and the verified losses is also considered. Although the historical method presents the best VaR performance, the best results with respect to the capital requirements belong to the RiskmetricsTMapproach.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo Silva Araújo & João Maurício de Souza Moreira & Ricardo dos Santos Maia Clemente, 2005. "Avaliação de métodos de exigência de capital para risco de ações no Brasil," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 9(2), pages 121-144.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:9:y:2005:i:2:380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/380/379
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/380/379
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:9:y:2005:i:2:380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.