IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v9y2005i1365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uma crítica à crítica domesticada nos estudos organizacionais

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Ceci Misoczky
  • Jackeline Amantino-de-Andrade

Abstract

This is a position paper; written to provoke the debate and the contradictory. The argument developed considers different conceptions of emancipation, as well as their consequence for the production of critics. It introduces the critical management studies, under the perspective developed by Alvesson and Willmott. Following it is discussed the issue of emancipation, having as a reference the formulations of the Frankfurt School, in its different phases. It is considered, then, an article by Alvesson e Willmott dedicated to the issue of emancipation and its translation into microemancipation, domesticating the critics in organizational studies. In opposition, it is adopted a definition of emancipation considering the production of two Latin American authors, Enrique Dussel and Paulo Freire. It is also paid a tribute to the Brazilian critical production. The article ends up with a brief consideration on the inscription of the critics as an opposition to the production of functional science.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Ceci Misoczky & Jackeline Amantino-de-Andrade, 2005. "Uma crítica à crítica domesticada nos estudos organizacionais," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 9(1), pages 193-210.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:9:y:2005:i:1:365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/365/365
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/365/365
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:9:y:2005:i:1:365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.