IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v7y2003i1206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ISO9000, consultants and paradoxes: a sociological analysis of quality assurance and human resource techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Isabella Freitas Gouveia de Vasconcelos
  • Flávio Carvalho de Vasconcelos

Abstract

This article analyses ISO9000 normalization processes as sources of organizational isomorphism according to the new institutional theory. We present two in-depth case studies in the French computer industry showing that there are two manners to implement ISO9000 standards: an in-depthprocedure (concerned with organizational effectiveness and with external legitimacy) and an instrumental one (only concerned with external legitimacy). Our findings show that resistance to change is a common phenomenon in ISO9000 implementation programs having high impact on organizational power games and informal structures. In order to face these issues we suggest that consultants must go beyond engineering consultation methods that are only concerned with the structural fit between the organizational standards and the ISO9000 requirements. The paradox HRM model shows that information that threatens an organization's collective self-concept is often ignored, rejected, reinterpreted or hidden. The manifestation of social defenses - the ways of groups of people deal with non-contained forms of anxiety and fear, can be seen as sources of behaviors blocking organizational change.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabella Freitas Gouveia de Vasconcelos & Flávio Carvalho de Vasconcelos, 2003. "ISO9000, consultants and paradoxes: a sociological analysis of quality assurance and human resource techniques," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 7(1), pages 173-194.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:7:y:2003:i:1:206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/206/209
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/206/209
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:7:y:2003:i:1:206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.